Quantcast
Channel: Alain.R.Truong
Viewing all 36084 articles
Browse latest View live

An Exceptional Emerald

$
0
0

1-0

1-1

Lot 135. An Exceptional 6.33 carats Colombian Emerald. Estimate 400,000 — 600,000 USD. Lot sold 1,095,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's2018.

The unmounted emerald-cut emerald weighing 6.33 carats.

Accompanied by AGL report no. 1089396 stating that the emerald is of Classic Colombian origin, clarity enhancement: none. Together with a letter from AGL stating that the emerald possesses "an exemplary combination of color and superior clarity, combined with an absence of enhancement and fine cut."

Accompanied by GIA report no. 2193029721 stating that the emerald is Colombian origin, with no indications of clarity enhancement.

Sotheby's. Magnificent Jewels, New York, 18 avr. 2018, 10:00 AM

 


An Impressive Sapphire and Diamond Ring

$
0
0

1-0

1-1

Lot 53. An Impressive 11.24 carats Kashmir Sapphire and Diamond Ring, circa 1920. Estimate 300,000 — 500,000 USD. Lot sold 999,000  USD. Courtesy Sotheby's2018.

Set with a cushion-cut sapphire weighing 11.24 carats, accented by numerous single-cut diamonds, size 6¼; circa 1920.

Accompanied by AGL report no. 1090290 stating that the sapphire is of Kashmir origin, with no indications of heating.

Accompanied by Gübelin report no. 18032002 stating that the sapphire is of Kashmir origin, with no indications of heating.

Sotheby's. Magnificent Jewels, New York, 18 avr. 2018, 10:00 AM

Fancy Intense Yellow Diamond and Diamond Ring

$
0
0

1-0

Lot 46. 11.71 carats Fancy Intense Yellow Diamond and 10.15 carats Diamond Ring. Estimate 400,000 — 600,000 USD. Lot sold 639,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Of crossover design, set with an oval-shaped Fancy Intense Yellow diamond weighing 11.71 carats and an oval-shaped near colorless diamond weighing 10.15 carats, flanked by shield-shaped diamonds, size 5¾, signed Krashes. 

Accompanied by GIA report no. 1182765406 stating that the 11.71 carat diamond is Fancy Intense Yellow, Natural Color, VVS2 clarity.

Accompanied by GIA report no. 5182765321 stating that the 10.15 carat diamond is F color, VS2 clarity

Sotheby's. Magnificent Jewels, New York, 18 avr. 2018, 10:00 AM

Gold, Turquoise and Diamond Grande and Petite Repeating Desk Clock with Alarm, Cartier

$
0
0

1-0

1-1

Lot 381. Gold, Turquoise and Diamond Grande and Petite Repeating Desk Clock with Alarm, Cartier. Estimate 60,000 — 80,000 USDLot sold 275,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's.

Composed of a rectangular reeded gold case with polished gold base, the silvered dial with buff-top turquoise and round diamond indicators, the hands applied with rose-cut diamonds, with subsidiary dial for alarm with arrow-form hands, minute repeating pusher at top applied with turquoise cabochon, manual winding movement, strike choice for quarters, silent, and hours and quartersrepeating on two gongs with two hammersmeasuring approximately 7 x 6 x 4⅝ inches, case and dial signed Cartier, movement signed Couaillet Frères, backplate signed European Watch & Clock Co., backplate numbered 20784 and 3289; circa 1938. With signed fitted box and key.

LiteratureFor a clock of similar design, see Made by Cartier by Franco Cologni and Ettore Mocchetti, page 156.

Sotheby's. The Jeweler’s Eye: The Personal Collection of Fred Leighton, New York, 18 Apr 2018, 02:00 PM

Trapani Ware from The Personal Collection of Fred Leighton sold at Sotheby's NY, 18 April 2018

$
0
0

The ancient fishing port of Trapani on the west coast of Sicily was renowned in the 16th-18th centuries for its production of objects made from local red coral. Most common were capezzale, devotional plaques with religious figures set in engraved copper frames with rich coral inlay and enamel decoration. Other work included liturgical items such as chalices and crucifixes, as well as secular objects like jewelry, inkstands, and small caskets, many of which made their way into European kunstkammern. The historic and aesthetic value of Trapani ware makes it a fitting complement to the 20th-century works in the Leighton Collection.

1-0

Lot 353. A Trapani coral inlaid and enameled plaque with the Madonna flanked by two saints, late 17th century: height 18 in.; width 14 in., 46 cm; 35.5 cm. Estimate 25,000 — 35,000 USDLot sold 75,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

ProvenanceManolo March Collection, Mallorca; Christie's Paris, June 16, 2015, lot 56

1-1

Lot 351. A Trapani coral-inlaid, enameled, and engraved plaque with standing saint and dragon, late 17th century; height 15 in.; width 12 in., 38 cm; 30.5 cm. Estimate 20,000 — 30,000 USDLot sold 50,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

ProvenanceSotheby's Monaco, June 22-23, 1991, lot 409.

1-2

Lot 352. A Trapani coral inlaid and enameled plaque inlaid with ten cameo portraits, late 17th century; height 18 1/4 in.; width 14 1/4 in., 46 cm; 36 cm. Estimate 20,000 — 30,000 USDLot sold 25,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Provenance: Manolo March Collection, Mallorca; Christie's Paris, June 16, 2015, lot 51.

1-5

Lot 349. A Trapani carved coral brooch with bust of Bacchus, the carved figure circa 1700, the mount probably later; height 3 in.; width 2 1/2 in., 7.5 cm; 6 cm. Estimate 2,000 — 3,000 USDLot sold 6,000 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

1-3

Lot 348. A Trapani coral and mother-of-pearl inlaid and enameled plaque with female saint holding a martyr's palm, circa 1700; height 5 1/2 in.; width 5 in., 14 cm; 13 cm. Estimate 3,000 — 5,000 USDLot sold 4,750 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Provenance: Sotheby's Monaco, June 22-23, 1991, lot 413.

1-4

Lot 350. A matched pair of Trapani octagonal coral plaques depicting figures of saints, late 17th century; height 3 1/2 in.; width 3 1/4 in., 9 cm; 8 cm. Estimate 3,000 — 5,000 USDLot sold 4,375 USD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018. 

Manolo March Collection, Mallorca; Christie's Paris, June 16, 2015, lot 35

Sotheby's. The Jeweler’s Eye: The Personal Collection of Fred Leighton, New York, 18 Apr 2018, 02:00 PM

Kazimir Malevich Landscape to star in Christie's Impressionist and Modern Art Evening Sale

$
0
0

1-0

Kazimir Malevich, Landscape, 1911. Gouache on paper laid down on board, 41 3/4 x 41 3/4 in. (106 x 106 cm.). Estimate: £7,000,000-10,000,000.© Christie’s Images Limited 2018

LONDON.- Kazimir Malevich’s Landscape (1911, estimate: £7,000,000-10,000,000) will be a major highlight of Christie’sImpressionist and Modern Art Evening Sale on 20 June 2018, part of ‘20th Century at Christie’s’, a series of auctions taking place from 15 to 21 June 2018. The monumental, square-format landscape is from ‘The Red Series’, a group of works characterised by gestural brush strokes and an expressive use of colour, referencing both Fauvism and Cubism, and anticipating Malevich’s move towards Suprematism. 

Landscape was first exhibited in the ‘Moscow Salon’ in February / March 1911. It was subsequently shown the following year in St. Petersburg as part of ‘The Union of Youth’, where Malevich represented a radical collective known as ‘Donkey’s Tail’. In 1927, he was invited to Germany to show his work for the first time outside Russia and brought with him the best works of his career to date. Landscape was one such work and remained in Berlin after Malevich returned to Russia. Due to the rise of totalitarianism in Germany and in his home country, the artist lost control of his works abroad before he died in 1935. Landscape resurfaced after the war and was acquired by the Kunstmuseum Basel, where it hung for over 50 years, before being restituted to the heirs of the artist. It is now being offered from a private collection and represents the first time that work has come to auction in two generations. Landscape will be exhibited in London from 15 to 20 June 2018. 

Landscape is a ‘pure’ landscape painting whose motif of peasant dwellings surrounded by stylized treetops is borrowed from Russian primitive art. The use of colour to sculpt the forms represented recalls the techniques employed by Cézanne, while the block-like depiction of the buildings nods towards the Cubist compositions of Braque and Picasso. By distilling these diverse visual references, Malevich has created a powerful and profoundly unique work of art. He himself stated that ‘one was obliged to move both along the line of primitive treatment of phenomena, and along the line of Cézanne to cubism.’ The red-hot gleam on the horizon is a direct depiction of the sun, one of the unique features of the painting that foretells the primacy of colour that would define Suprematism. In the early 1930s, Malevich returned to creating ‘pure’ landscapes, producing Landscape with five houses, Landscape with a white house, and Red House, all of which are in the collection of the State Russian Museum. 

Jay Vincze, Senior International Director, Impressionist and Modern Art, Christie’s: “Malevich was one of the most dynamic Russian Avant Garde artists whose continual strive to redefine the pictorial plane resulted in an incredibly varied and ultimately hugely influential body of work, most of which is to be found in public institutions around the globe. This early landscape shows the artist absorbing the lessons of his European counterparts while moving in a wholly unique direction, towards what would become his most significant and radical style – Suprematism. We are honoured to present such a rare work to auction for the first time at Christie’s in London."

A rare 'Jizhou''Phoenix' vase, Yuan dynasty (1279-1366)

$
0
0

A rare 'JIzhou''Phoenix' vase, Yuan dynasty (1279-1366)

Lot 72. A rare 'Jizhou''Phoenix' vase, Yuan dynasty (1279-1366); 28 cm, 11 in. Estimate 100,000 — 150,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

the baluster body rising from a slightly spreading foot to a waisted neck and slightly lipped rim, applied with a thick opaque black glaze, reserved on the buff biscuit with two pairs of phoenix circling in the air, one of each with four long tail feathers, the two pairs divided by clouds, the base glazed in black below the foot.

ProvenanceSotheby’s London, 11th December 1990, lot 220. 

Note: Jizhou vases decorated with this elaborate phoenix design are rare, and the present piece is particularly notable for its rich black-coffee brown glaze that provides a striking contrast with the two pairs of phoenix in white reserve. The four birds appear animated with the details of the flowing feathers and eyes painted in swift brushwork.

A similar vase, in the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, is published in Robert D. Mowry, Hare's Fur, Tortoiseshell and Partridge Feathers, Cambridge, Mass, 1995, pl. 103; another, illustrated in Nuno de Castro, A Ceramica e a Porcelana Chinesas, Porto, 1992, vol. 1, pl. 169, was sold in these rooms, 11th December 1990, lot 220; a slightly larger meiping was sold in our New York rooms, 17th March 2015, lot 181; and a smaller example, decorated with a less elaborate design, was sold in our Hong Kong rooms, 4th December 2015, lot 265. Compare also a meiping of the same shape but decorated with a blossoming prunus branch illustrated in the Complete Collection of Treasures from the Palace Museum. Porcelain of the Song Dynasty (II), Hong Kong, 1996, pl. 217.

A large and unusual 'Jizhou''Phoenix' meiping, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279). Height 14 1/4 in., 36.2 cm. Sold for 50,000 USD at Sotheby's New York, 17th March 2015, lot 181. Courtesy Sotheby's 2015

A large and unusual 'Jizhou''Phoenix' meiping, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279)Height 14 1/4  in., 36.2 cm. Sold for 50,000 USD at Sotheby's New York, 17th March 2015, lot 181. Courtesy Sotheby's 2015

Cf. my post: A large and unusual 'Jizhou''Phoenix' meiping, Southern Song dynasty

A superb Jizhou''Phoenix' vase, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279); 24.5 cm., 9 5/8 in. Sold for 175,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 4th December 2015, lot 265. Courtesy Sotheby's 2015

A superb  Jizhou''Phoenix' vase, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279); 24.5 cm., 9 5/8  in. Sold for 175,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 4th December 2015, lot 265Courtesy Sotheby's 2015

well potted with an ovoid body rising to a wide, slightly tapered, neck and a lipped rim, applied overall with a rich dark brown glaze, save for two pairs of phoenix in flight left in the biscuit on each side and fired to a pale orange colour, each pair consisting of a phoenix rising and another swooping downwards, with details drawn in brown slip and flower heads dividing the pairs.

Note: slightly larger vase of this type, painted with a dynamic and elaborate image of a phoenix, in the Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Cambridge, was included in the Museum's exhibition Hare's Fur, Tortoiseshell and Partridge Feathers. Chinese Brown and Black Glazed Ceramics 400-1400, Cambridge, 1995, cat. no. 103, where the author notes that the form of these meiping derives from contemporary silver bottles, such as the one recovered from a tomb dated to 1195 in Jiangpu county, Jiangsu province (see p. 253).

Further related vases include one sold in our London rooms, 11th December 1990, lot 220; and another also painted with scattered prunus blossoms, sold in our New York rooms, 17th March 2015, lot 181.

Mowry, op. cit., p. 253, notes that this vase is a quintessential Song shape which originated from silver bottles, such as the one recovered from a Song tomb dated to 1195 in Jiangpu county, Jiangsu province, and another recovered amongst the cargo of the Chinese merchant ship that sank off the coast of Sinan, Korea, in the early 1320s. Mowry suggests that the Sinan shipwreck silver bottle, which has straight walls, broad and high-set shoulders, and a waisted neck with a slightly flaring lip, is possibly the closest in form to Jizhou vases of this shape.

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM

A rare 'Ding' censer and cover, Northern Song dynasty (960-1127)

$
0
0

A rare 'Ding' censer and cover, Northern Song dynasty (960-1127)

Lot 73. A rare 'Ding' censer and cover, Northern Song dynasty (960-1127); 15 cm, 6 in. Estimate 80,000 — 120,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

the rounded body supported on a domed pedestal foot carved with four quatrefoil cut out panels, the cover carved with an open work design of diaper leading up to a flower head, all covered in an ivory coloured glaze, deepening to an olive tone where it pools.

Provenance: Collection of Frederick M. Mayer. 
Christie's London, 24th/25th June 1974, lot 34.
Collection of Walter Hochstadter.
Christie's New York, 18th/19th March 2009, lot 510.
J.J. Lally & Co, Oriental Art, March 2010.

Exhibited J. J. Lally & Co, Oriental Art,  Chinese Ceramics in Black and White, New York, 2010, cat. no. 17.

Note: A related censer, excavated at Taiyuan city, Shanxi province, and now in the Shangxi Provincial Museum, is illustrated in Zhongguo taoci quanji/The Complete Works of Chinese Ceramics, vol. 7, Shanghai, 2000, pl. 215. Compare another censer of this type, the cover with similar cutouts but on a different foot, published in Regina Krahl, Chinese Ceramics from the Meiyintang Collection, vol. I, London, pl. 345.

Similarly pierced censers covered in a qingbai glaze are also known to have been produced; see one included in Hsien-Ch'I Tseng and Robert Paul Dart, The Charles B. Hoyt Collection in the Museum of Fine Arts: Boston, vol. II, Boston, 1972, pl. 64.

1-0

Censer with openwork base and qingbai glaze, Southern Song dynasty, 12th century. Bequest of Charles Bain Hoyt—Charles Bain Hoyt Collection, 50.2060a-b © 2018 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM


Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop) by Jeong Seon, 1711

$
0
0

Jeong Seon painted this album following his first trip to the Diamond Mountains. He likely traveled northeast from the capital, Hanyang (today’s Seoul), and traversed the mountain range from Inner to Outer Geumgang toward the sea. Displayed here are six scenes from a total of thirteen (the last leaf in the album is a colophon). The varied compositions reveal Jeong’s early experimentations, which he would repeat, adapt, or refine over the course of his career.

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), General View of Inner Geumgang, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 14 1/4 × 14 7/8 in. (36.2 × 37.8 cm) © National Museum of Korea

This overview format as well as the juxtaposition of dark, foliage-covered rolling peaks and the white spiky pillars reveal Jeong’s ingenuity. Prominent sites enfolded into this view include Jangan Temple and the adjacent stone bridge in the foreground center and the tallest summit, Biro Peak, in the far distance. Labeling important sites is a convention Jeong applied to many of his paintings of the Diamond Mountains, which other artists followed.  

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), Mount Geumgang Viewed from Danbal Ridge, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 14 1/8 × 14 5/8 in. (35.9 × 37.1 cm) © National Museum of Korea

Travelers to the Diamond Mountains usually approached from the Danbal Ridge, from where they would catch their first glimpse of the glittering rocky peaks—depicted here as if floating in the sky, creating a sense of drama and wondrous discovery. Jeong employed multiple perspectives to create this view.

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), Buljeongdae Rock, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 14 1/4 × 14 7/8 in. (36.2 × 37.8 cm)© National Museum of Korea

This haunting scene beautifully captures the main rock in the center (with a cluster of pine trees atop) surrounded by stunning and ghostly white pillars floating behind. This site is one among many celebrated markers within Inner Geumgang. 

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), Baekcheon Bridge, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 14 5/8 × 13 1/2 in. (37.1 × 34.3 cm)© National Museum of Korea

The Baekcheon Bridge, which is not visible in this scene, straddles the transition from Inner to Outer Geumgang, the eastern part of the Diamond Mountains. The delightful close-up scenery focuses as much on the travelers as the landscape, and reveals the changing modes of their transportation: from sedan chairs, as seen on the left of the stream, to horses, on the right.  

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), Haesan Pavilion, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 10 5/8 × 14 3/4 in. (27 × 37.5 cm)© National Museum of Korea

Unlike the previous two scenes, this leaf depicts a relatively large swath of the mountains, in an overhead composition. With the white rocky peaks in the background, a wide slice of Sea Geumgang is presented—from the Haesan Pavilion in the middle ground to the Seven Star Pillars, a constellation of oddly shaped rocks, in the sea on the lower left corner. 

1

Jeong Seon (artist name: Gyeomjae) (Korean, 1676–1759), Chongseok Pavilion, from Album of Mount Geumgang (Pungak-docheop), 1711, Joseon dynasty (1392–1910). Six leaves from a fourteen-leaf album; ink and light color on silk, 14 7/8 × 14 3/4 in. (37.8 × 37.5 cm)© National Museum of Korea

Among the most striking sceneries of the Diamond Mountains are the basalt formations rising out of the sea along the eastern coast of the peninsula. The pavilion on the cliff shares the center stage in this composition, while the surrounding water occupies more than half the space. In later depictions, Jeong often placed greater focus on the fantastical rocks. 

ProvenancePurchased in 1908 by the Imperial Museum (under the Japanese colonial government) which became the National Museum of Korea in 1965.

A rare blue and white globular bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435)

$
0
0

A rare blue and white globular bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435)

Lot 508. A rare blue and white globular bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435)Estimate 800,000 — 1,200,000 HKDLot sold 960,000 HKD. Courtesy Sotheby's 2005.

the globular body potted with generously rounded sides, painted in soft tones of characteristic 'heaped and piled' cobalt-blue with five large peony flower-heads blooming from long winding stems further issuing tight buds and foliage, all above a band of upright lappets and a border of stylised scrolling stems of at the foot, and below a band of scrolling lotus at tapered rim between a double-line border, the six-character mark inscribed in a line at the shoulder.

Note: This small globular bowl is perfectly formed in its ergonomical shape and delicately painted with the vibrant cobalt blue typical of the Xuande period. Bowls of this type were used during Buddhist religious ceremonies and are called qing shui wan which can be translated as 'pure water bowl'. The bowl was filled with water, that symbolized purity, and was carried during the prayers. The small size and rounded shape allowed it to be held comfortably in one's palms.

A small number of similar examples can be found in important museums and private collections. See one in the Palace Museum, Beijing, illustrated in Ming chu qinghua ci, vol.2, Beijing, 2002, pl. 122; one in the National Palace, Taipei, included in Minji meihin zuroku, vol.1, Tokyo, 1977, pl. 51, together with a globular stem bowl of Xuande mark and period that would have been used for the same purpose, pl. 52. Another bowl of this form and design is illustrated in Chinese Ceramics in the Idemitsu Collection, Tokyo, 1987, pl. 636; and one from the collection of Sir Percival and Lady David, London, was included in the Exhibition of Chinese Art, Palazzo Ducale, Venice, 1954, cat.no. 639.

A bowl of this design without reign mark, also attributed to the Xuande period, is in the British Museum, London, from the collection of Sir John Addis, illustrated in Jessica Harrison-Hall, Ming Ceramics, London, 2001, p. 132, pl. 4:22.

Blue and white bowls of very similar shape and painted decoration have been sold at major auctions: such as the piece from the Edward T. Chow collections sold in these rooms, 19th May 1981, lot 402, and again, 3rd May 1994, lot 40; and one from the Fuller collection, sold at Christie's London, 28/29th June 1965, lot 147.

Sotheby's. A Collection of Exceptional Imperial Porcelain, Hong Kong, 02 may 2005 

A rare blue and white 'Peony' bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435)

$
0
0

A rare blue and white 'Peony

Lot 134. A rare blue and white 'Peony' bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435); 9.5 cm, 3 3/4  in. Estimate 80,000 — 120,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

the rounded sides rising from a concave foot, painted to the sides in inky washes of cobalt blue with peonies borne on the same continuous scroll surrounded by fleshy leaves and attendant buds, with a band of classic scroll and lappets at the foot and a band of lotus scrolls at the rim, the underglaze blue six-character mark inscribed horizontally below the rim.

Note: Perfectly formed in its ergonomical shape and delicately painted with vibrant cobalt blue, this bowl is a charming example of the outstanding imperial wares characteristic of Xuande porcelain. Bowls of this form are described in Archibald Brankston, early Ming Wares of Chingtechen, Beijing, 1938, p. 25, as jing shui wan (pure water bowl) which were filled with water and used during prayers for purification. The small size and rounded shape allowed it to be held comfortably in one's palms.

A small number of closely related bowls can be found in important museums and private collections; see one from the Qing Court collection and still in Beijing, published in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum. Blue and White Porcelain with Underglazed Red (I), Hong Kong, 2008, pl. 130, together with a Xuande mark and period stem bowl that would have been used for a similar purpose, pl. 131; one in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, included in the Museum's exhibition Ming Xuande ciqi fezhan mulu [Special exhibition of Hsuan-te wares], 1980, cat. no. 20; another published in Chinese Ceramics in the Idemitsu Collection Tokyo, 1987, pl. 636; and a fourth from the collection of Sir Percival and Lady David, included in the exhibition of Chinese Art, Palazzo Ducale, Venice, 1954, cat. no. 639. A small number of bowls have been offered at auction; one, from the collection of E.T. Chow, was sold twice in our Hong Kong rooms, 19th May 1981, lot 402, and 3rd May 1994, lot 40; another, included in the Ceramic Society of Japan's Inaugural Exhibition, Hiroshima, 1954, lot 14, was sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 30th May 2012, lot 4056; and a third was sold in our Hong Kong rooms, 2nd May 2005, lot 508.

Stemmed bowl with carnation scroll, Ming dynasty, Xuande mark and period, AD 1426–35. Porcelain with underglaze cobalt-blue decoration, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi province, 10,3 x 9,8 cm. Percival Daivid Foundation of Art, PDF A636 © 2017 Trustees of the British

Stemmed bowl with carnation scroll, Ming dynasty, Xuande mark and period, AD 1426–35. Porcelain with underglaze cobalt-blue decoration, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi province, 10,3 x 9,8 cm. Percival Daivid Foundation of Art, PDF A636 © 2017 Trustees of the British Museum

1-1

A rare early Ming blue and white globular bowl, jingshuiwan, Xuande six-character mark in a line and of the period (1426-1435), 3 3/4 in. (9.7 cm.) diam. Sold for 2,180,000 HKD at Christie's Hong Kong, 30th May 2012, lot 4056. © Christie's Images Ltd 2012

Cf. my post: A rare early Ming blue and white globular bowl,jingshuiwan, Xuande six-character mark in a line and of the period (1426-1435)

1-2

A rare blue and white globular bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435). Sold for 960,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 2nd May 2005, lot 508. Courtesy Sotheby's 2005.

 Cf. my post: A rare blue and white globular bowl, Xuande mark and period (1426-1435)

Bowls of this type, but lacking the reign mark, include one, from the collection of Sir John Addis and now in the British Museum, London, published in Jessica Harrison-Hall, Ming Ceramics in the British Museum, London, 2001, pl. 4.22; another from the Fuller collection was sold at Christie's London, 28th/29th June 1965, lot 147; and a third illustrated in John Ayers, Chinese Ceramics. The Koger Collection, London, 1985, pl. 50.

1-3

Small blue and white globular porcelain bowl with underglaze blue decoration, Ming dynasty, Xuande period (1426-1435). Height: 7.5 cm. Donated by Sir John M Addis, 1975,1028.10 © 2017 Trustees of the British Museum

A similar bowl with Xuande mark and period, displayed on its wooden stand, is included in an extant handscroll of the Yongzheng period, Guwantu (Pictures of Antiques), in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, coll. no. E59-1911, dated in accordance with 1729, which depicts works of art from the Imperial collection.

1-3

Gu Wan Tu 古玩圖 (Pictures of Ancient Playthings), handscroll, ink and colours on paper, China, Qing, 1729. Ink and colour on paper; E.59-1911 © Victoria and Albert Museum, London 2017. 

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM

A yellow-ground and underglaze-blue 'Gardenia' dish, Zhengde mark and period (1506-1521)

$
0
0

A yellow-ground and underglaze-blue 'Gardenia' dish, Zhengde mark and period (1506-1521)

1-0

Lot 135. A yellow-ground and underglaze-blue 'Gardenia' dish, Zhengde mark and period (1506-1521); 25.2 cm, 9 7/8  in. Estimate 50,000 — 70,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

 the shallow rounded sides rising from a short tapered foot to an everted rim, painted in various tones of cobalt on a rich yellow ground, the interior painted with a medallion enclosing a leafy branch bearing two five-petalled gardenia flowers, encircled in the cavetto with branches of pomegranate, crab apple, grape and a bouquet of lotus, between double line borders, the underside with a continuous scroll of seven large blooming roses borne on a foliate stem, between double lines at the rim and foot, the base left white and inscribed in underglaze blue with a six-character mark within double circles, Japanese wood box.

Note: The gardenia (zhizi) is a flower very rarely depicted on Chinese ceramics and known almost exclusively from the present design. It is not immediately associated with any auspicious meaning, but the highly fragrant flowers were popular with ladies to wear in the hair, and were used for flavouring tea and for preparing cosmetics, and the small fruits of the plant were coveted for dyeing – producing a fine yellow or orange colour – as well as for their medicinal benefits.

The blue-and-yellow colour scheme was developed in the Xuande period (1426-35), when the first dishes of this design were produced and was taken up again in the Chenghua period (1465-87). In both periods, the base of the dishes was generally still unglazed and the mark inscribed in a horizontal cartouche below the rim. In the Hongzhi and Zhengde reigns the design experienced its peak, and after the Jiajing reign (1522-66), when rare examples were still produced, was totally abandoned. 

This dish is particularly rare for its large size and six-character mark on the base, and only one other example appears to have been published, excavated in Beijing and now in the Capital Museum, Beijing, illustrated in Zhongguo taoci quanji[Complete series on Chinese ceramics], vol. 13, Shanghai, 1999, pl. 147. A larger dish (29.5cm), also with a six-character mark, from the Qing Court collection and still in Beijing, is illustrated in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum. Blue and White Porcelain with Underglazed Red (II), Shanghai, 2000, pl. 232, together with a smaller dish with a four-character mark on the base, pl. 233. Further smaller dishes with six-character marks include one in the British Museum, London, published in Jessica Harrison-Hall, Ming Ceramics in the British Museum, London, 2001, pl. 8:23; one in the Shanghai Museum, Shanghai, illustrated in Lu Minghua, Shanghai Bowuguan cangpin yanjiu daxi/Studies of the Shanghai Museum Collections : A Series of Monographs. Mingdai guanyao ciqi [Ming imperial porcelain], Shanghai, 2007, pl. 1-41; and a fourth example from the Meiyintang Collection, illustrated in Regina Krahl, Chinese Ceramics from the Meiyintang Collection, London, 1994-2010, vol. 2, pl. 683, sold in our Hong Kong rooms, 9th October 2012, lot 43.

1-2

Dish with gardenia, Ming dynasty, Underglaze blue six-character Zhengde reign mark in a double ring and period, AD 1506–1521, Porcelain with underglaze blue decoration and yellow glaze, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi province. Bequeathed by Henry Blackwell Harris, 1929,0722.11 © Trustees of the British Museum

1-1

An Underglaze-Blue and Yellow-Enamel 'Gardenia' Dish. Mark and Period of Zhengde (1506-1521) from the Meiyintang Collection; 20 cm., 7 7/8 in. Sold for 1,220,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 9th October 2012, lot 43Photo Sotheby's 

Cf. my post: An Underglaze-Blue and Yellow-Enamel 'Gardenia' Dish, Mark and Period of Zhengde

1-1

Dish with gardenia, Ming dynasty, Zhengde six-character mark in a double circle in underglaze blue on the base and period, AD 1506–1521, Porcelain with underglaze blue decoration and yellow glaze, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi province. On loan from Sir Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, PDF A743 © Trustees of the British Museum

1-3

An underglaze-blue and yellow-enamel 'Gardenia' dish, Mark and period of Zhengde, Collection of the Toguri Museum of Art, Tokyo. Sold 937,500 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 8 october 2013. Photo: Sotheby's.

Cf. my post: An underglaze-blue and yellow-enamel 'Gardenia' dish, Mark and period of Zhengde

1-4

A rare Yellow-Ground Blue And White 'Gardenia' Dish, Mark and Period of Zhengde (1506-1521) from the Collection of Maureen Pilkington. Sold 2,980,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 05 april 2017, lot 4Photo: Sotheby's.

Cf. my post: A rare Yellow-Ground Blue And White 'Gardenia' Dish, Mark and Period of Zhengde (1506-1521)

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM

A copper-red bottle vase, yuhuchun ping, Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795)

$
0
0

A copper-red bottle vase, yuhuchun ping ,Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795)

1-0

Lot 25. A copper-red bottle vase, yuhuchun ping, Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795); 30 cm, 12 in. Estimate 60,000 — 80,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

the rounded sides rising from a spreading foot to a waisted neck and everted rim, richly applied on the exterior with a deep copper-red glaze, the base with a seal mark in underglaze blue.

This vase is notable for its vibrant copper-red glaze, the even tone which accentuates the graceful curves of its profile. Copper was notoriously difficult to fire, as the slightest irregularity in any stage of the production would result in undesirable colour and hence the rejection of the piece. With the technical advances made at the imperial kilns in Jingdezhen from the early Qing dynasty, by the Qianlong reign (r. 1736-1795) potters were able to accomplish such previously unattained command over the pigment to successfully create a number of monochrome vessels with a strong and even red tone, such as the present vase.

Copper-red vases of this type are held in important museums and private collections worldwide; see one in the Tokyo National Museum, Tokyo, included in the Museum’s exhibition Chinese Arts of the Ming and Ch’ing Periods, 1963, cat. no. 440; one in the Nanjing Museum, Nanjing, illustrated in The Official Kiln Porcelain of the Chinese Qing Dynasty, Shanghai, 2003, pl. 346; another from the Songzhutang Collection, sold twice in our New York rooms, 17th September 2003, lot 100 and 15th September 2015, lot 85; and a fourth vase from the Duke of Fife and Bulgari Collection, sold in our New York rooms, 14th September 2011, lot 213. Further Qianlong marked copper-red glazed vases of this type include one from the Gordon Collection, sold at Christie’s New York, 24th March 2011, lot 1144; and another sold in these rooms, 17th December 1996, lot 134, and again in our Hong Kong rooms, 3rd October 2017, lot 3654.

Lot 85. A copper-red glazed vase (yuhuchunping), Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795). Height 11 3/4 in., 29.9 cm. Estimate 80,000 — 100,000 USD. Lot sold 100,000 USD. Photo: Sotheby's.

 Property from the Songzhutang collection. A copper-red glazed vase (yuhuchunping), Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795). Height 11 3/4  in., 29.9 cm. Sold for 100,000 USD at Sotheby's, New York, 15th September 2015, lot 85. Photo: Sotheby's.

 Cf. my post: A copper-red glazed vase (yuhuchunping), Qianlong seal mark and period (1736-1795)

1-3

A copper-red-glazed pear-shaped vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795), 11¾ in. (30 cm.) high. Sold for 218,500 USD at Christie's, New York, 24th March 2011, lot 1144. © Christie's Images Ltd 2011 

 Cf. my post: A copper-red-glazed pear-shaped vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795)

1-2

A copper-red glazed vase, yuhuchunping, seal mark and period of Qianlong (1736-1795), 30 cm, 11 3/4  in. Sold for 600,000 HKD at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 3rd October 2017, lot 3654Photo: Sotheby's.

Cf. my post: A copper-red glazed vase, yuhuchunping, seal mark and period of Qianlong

 . Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM

A rare 'Longquan' celadon 'Dragon and Bird' jar and cover, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279)

$
0
0

A rare 'Longquan' celadon 'Dragon and Bird' jar and cover, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279)

Lot 67. A rare 'Longquan' celadon 'Dragon and Bird' jar and cover, Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279); 27.2 cm, 10 3/4  in. Estimate 60,000 — 80,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

the tall ovoid body finely potted with three ribs encircling the upper body and supported on a flared foot, applied at the shoulder in high relief with a powerful dragon with long sinuous body coiled around the sides in pursuit of a 'flaming pearl', poised with mighty paws set with outstretched talons gripped to the surface, set with ferocious gaping jaws, bulbous eyes and long horns, the body carved with scale pattern and flaming mane, the domed cover surmounted by a bird-form finial, covered all over in an even celadon-green glaze, the unglazed footring and mouth rim burnt russet-brown in the firing.

ProvenanceSotheby's Hong Kong, 21st May 1985, lot 73.
Sotheby’s London, 12th November, 2003, lot 79. 

ExhibitedSelected Treasures of Chinese Art, Min Chiu Society Thirtieth Anniversary Exhibition, Hong Kong Museum of Art, Hong Kong, 1990-91, cat. no. 112.
Song Ceramics from the Kwan Collection, Hong Kong Museum of Art, Hong Kong, 1994, cat. no. 57.

Note: Funerary jars of this type are described by Julian Thompson in 'Chinese Celadons', Arts of Asia, November-December, 1993, p. 62, as belonging to the finest Longquan celadon vessels recorded. The glaze of the present jar is a thick lustrous bluish green, often referred to as the kinuta glaze by the Japanese who were especially fond of these wares. Kinuta wares are considered as masterpieces of the Longquan potter, who prepared the perfect glaze executed masterful knowledge and skill over his kiln.  

A related jar and cover, from the Avery Brundage collection in the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco, San Francisco, is illustrated in Mary Tregear, Song Ceramics, London, 1982, pl. 286; another, from the Charles Russell and H.M. Knight collections, was sold in these rooms, 12th July 1960, lot 147, and again, 15th July 1980, lot 75; and a further example, from Eskenazi, London, and illustrated in Julian Thompson, op. cit., p. 61, fig. 1 left, was sold in these rooms, 8th November 2006, lot 53.  Compare also a jar and cover in the Indianapolis Museum of Art included in the exhibition Beauty and Tranquillity: the Eli Lilly Collection of Chinese Art, Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis, 1983, pl. 78; another of similar size and with a domed cover surmounted by a bird finial, from the collection of Warren E. Cox, included in the exhibition Chinese Ceramics in Chicago Collections, Mary and Leigh Block Museum of Art, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1982, p. 35, cat. no. 19, sold twice in our New York rooms, 24th May 1944, lot 53, and again, 19th March 2007, lot 138; and a third example, from the Carl Kempe collection, sold in these rooms, 14th may 2008, lot 312.  

It is thought that funerary jars of this type were made in pairs, one bearing the 'Green Dragon' of the East and the other the 'White Tiger' of the West. A pair from the Sir Percival David collection and now in the British Museum, London, is published in Margaret Medley, Illustrated Catalogue of Celadon Wares, London, 1977, pl. IV, no. 36, where she notes that these jars may have been filled with aromatic oils.

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, London, 16 May 2018, 10:30 AM 

 

The second Antique Arms Fair set to open in London

$
0
0

1-0

Ottoman shield of gilt-Copper (tombak). Early 17th century. Image provided by Peter Finer Ltd. 

LONDON.- The inaugural Antique Arms Fair at Olympia London of September 2017, a showcase for fine antique arms, armour and militaria from an array of UK based and international specialist dealers, received very positive feedback from dealers and collectors alike regarding the high standard of the fair, excellent sales, and good attendance. The organisers hope to emulate and build on this positive start in their next fair on the 21st April 2018, and are delighted to welcome back high-profile dealers such as Peter Finer, Hatford Antiques, Magazin Royal, and Runjeet Singh among many others. 

This year the fair organisers have chosen to sponsor the highly regarded Queen Elizabeth Scholarship Trust, an organisation which works, “to make a difference to the lives and careers of crafts people whilst maintaining the very highest standards in craftsmanship.” The Trust provides numerous scholarships, and has supported over 130 different crafts, from the contemporary to the traditional. Donations received on the day of the fair as well as 50% of ticket sales will go to the Trust.  

The fair promises to maintain a broad range of high-quality pieces on show: Peter Finer Ltd will be exhibiting an Ottoman shield of gilt-Copper (tombak), early 17th century (pictured above), and Antique Auctions Support Network Ltd’s display will include an Indo-Persian dagger (jambiya) with ivory hilt. Garth Vincent Antique Arms & Armour will include a pair of flintlock pistols by Scamadine and an unusual flintlock pocket pistol by Gilet of Bristol. Prices for pieces at the fair will range from the tens of pounds to the thousands, ensuring a broad range of purchasing options for collectors at all levels. 

1-1

An Indo-Persian dagger (jambiya) with ivory hilt. Image provided by A.A.S.N. Ltd.

1-2

An Early Pair of 22-Bore Flintlock Pistols Of ‘Queen Anne’ Type By T. Scamadine, London, Circa 1715. Image provided by Garth Vincent Antique Arms & Armour.

1

 

An unusual flintlock pocket pistol by Gilet of BristolImage provided by Garth Vincent Antique Arms & Armour.

An accompanying guide will be provided to exhibitors and visitors as previously, with articles written by experts such as Pierre Terjanian (Arthur Ochs Curator in Charge at the Metropolitan Museum of Art) and Tobias Capwell (Curator of Arms and Armour at the Wallace Collection). It is hoped that the guide will once again provide exciting insights into the latest research and developments in the field of antique arms and armour.  

The Antique Arms Fair will take place at Olympia, London on Saturday 21st April 2018, 09:00-15:00. Pillar Hall, Olympia Way, Olympia, London W14 8UX.

1-3

Élégant couteau moghol au manche en jade clair partiellement incrusté d'argent, Inde, probablement région de Jaîpur, circa 1680Image provided by Patrick Mestdagh

1-4

 A Korean helmet damascened in gold, for a high-ranking member of the royal household, Joseon dynasty, probably Yeongjo period, about 1724–76. Image provided by Peter Finer Ltd.

1-5

Vietnamese ‘Babao’ (Eight Treasures) Processional Standard, 19th century. Image provided by Runjeet Singh Ltd


Rugs and Carpets: Including Distinguished Collections at Sotheby's London, 23 April 2018

$
0
0

1

Sotheby’s London is delighted to announce its new Spring Rugs and Carpets sales to be held alongside London Islamic week. Our sale includes distinguished collections and offers a wide range of property drawn across Europe and the USA, with selected works representative of the international weaving centres of Persia, Caucasus, Anatolia, Central Asia, China, and Europe. We also include the second instalment of the prominent collection of Christopher Alexander; the first half formed the core of our NOVEMBER SALE last year. This second group being offered focuses almost exclusively on early and archaic Anatolian examples, with the exception of a beautiful vibrant green Khorossan fragment.

Further highlights included are a large Karapinar rug fragment formerly in the Bernheimer and Wher Collections, a Kum Kapi silk ‘Emperor Carpet’ of extraordinary quality and remarkable size (approximately 630 by 314cm),  an extremely fine Pashmina rug with design after a pair of Safavid compartment carpets, both from the early 20th century. A striking 17thor 18th century Caucasian rug with design harkening to the so called ‘Portuguese’ carpets of Khorossan and unusual Yomut main carpet. Striking 20th century weaves from Iran and a charming collection of works bought in the 1930s by Lt. Colonel D.R.Thomas, O.B.E., I.M.S., Chemical Examiner to Government, Punjab, Lahore whilst posted in India.

1

1-0

1-1

1-2

Lot 28. From the Alexander Collection. A 'Karapinar' rug fragment, South Central Anatolia; approximately 275 by 134cm; 9ft., 4ft. 5in., late 17th or early 18th century. Estimate 50,000 — 80,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

incorporating two fragments from the same rug

Provenance: the larger fragment with Eskenazi, London, by 1985, the smaller acquired from Gary Muse, London, 1985

LiteratureOakley. P., 'fact or fiction 'Karapinar' rugs from Central Anatolia', Hali, Winter, 2010, issue 166, p. 50

Eskenazi, J.,'The Alexander Collection: Part I Weaving as Liturgy', Hali, April/May 1994, issue 74, p. 82, fig. 2.

Alexander, C., A Foreshadowing of 21st Century Art The Color and Geometry of Very Early Turkish Carpets, New York, 1993, pp. 172 - 175, ill pp. 86, 175 (details) & 173.

Hali, issue 28, October/November/December, 1985, p. 45.

Note: Characteristic of the prestige of the Alexander collection, this present lot is a rare example with a richness in design almost unparalleled and, in common with other examples of this genre, it presents a quandary in terms of exact origin. In his opening statement for his entry on this work, Alexander says it is 'Perhaps one of the most interesting carpets discovered in recent times.' Alexander, A Foreshadowing, op.cit, p 172, a statement not without foundation.

Within the rug are elements shared with weavings from Turkmenistan, East and Central Persia, the Caucasus and Central Anatolia. In examining the border there is a clear correlation with the ‘Karapinar’ affectionately known as the Pink Panther, sold Sotheby’s London, 7 November 2017, lot 30. In both examples the border is composed of an intertwined trellising with stylised rosettes, the Panther with red and underlying blue and the present work vice versa – they each also share the same inner guard design too. In addition the present lot has vibrant ivory white rosette flowerheads within the border, further shared with another of the Alexander ‘Karapinars’ within this sale, see lot 45. This brilliant ivory, also seen within the field, is a trait which is associated with Karapinar weaves, see Beattie. M., ‘Some Rugs of the Konya Region’, Oriental Art, London, Spring, 1976, vol. 22, pp. 60 – 61 for further reference to the weaving region.

Interestingly this meandering border draws comparison with 17th century examples from Khorossan, see Sotheby’s New York, 1 October 2015, lot 97, and also later re-appears in other works such as 19th century ‘C’ and ‘Eagle’ Yomut main carpets, (for example Sotheby’s London, 1 November 2015, lots 22 and 23). Yet the border, whilst relating to Persian design, does seem to have an inherent Anatolian identity, whereas the main, and highly unusual, field design appears to derive from Safavid courtly carpets, the stylised mosque lamps a replacement for the traditional vase. When looking at what Alexander calls ‘flaming animal spirits’ it seems more likely these are a derivation of sickle leaves, again reminiscent of ‘vase’ carpets. Even with Central Persian weavings as an apparently compelling precursor, on closer inspection the spirits or leaves  have a semblance more indigenous to the area; the Quercus cerris or Turkish oak, which grows along the southerly coastline of modern Turkey. This would suggest the present lot could have originated at a Southerly point of the Karapinar region and that the weaver was informed of the great courtly productions in Persia.

What is less explainable is the highly unusual three ‘V’ shaped splayed leaves within the field. There are some possible influences, again hearkening to the courtly productions, these ‘V’ shaped leaves could be an interpretation of latticed vinery or leaves. When reviewing a black and white image of such an example this comparison becomes a little clearer, see the ‘vase’ carpet fragment in the MAK, Vienna, illustrated in Campana. P., Il Tappeto Orientale, Milan, 1962, pl. 36. In this black and white negative the vase, or urn, and the vines and leaves show a clear resemblance to the offered Karapinar, again there is correlation in the border design. It is also worth noting that these extravagant sweeping leaves are a rarity in any weave and are only really seen in the rarest of ‘vase’ techniques carpets, the sickle leaf pattern. The legendary Clark Sickle-leaf carpet sold Sotheby’s New York, 5 June 2013, lot 12, whilst very different in many respects, displays some design traits which the offered ‘Karapinar’ seems to take inspiration from. There is one other 17th/18th century ‘Karapinar’ example which compares more directly than others. Now in the Türk ve Islam Eserleri Müzesi, Istanbul, formerly in the Alaaddin Keykubat Shrine, Konya, and cited by Oakley. P., op cit, p. 44, 48, 49, fig 9, this example shares the field design elements such as the ‘V’ splayed leaves, oak leaves, vertical palmettes and the mosque urns of the present lot. However these designs are inverted to meet at the centre of the rug; they are also of a similar scale and have a related border design. Oakley ascribes this example as the earliest of the second of her chronological groupings she assigns to the works with known provenance to Karapinar, the ex-Bernheimer to group one and the ‘Pink Panther’ group 3.

See also a 17th century Konya fragment, possibly from Ladik, which compares  both in colour tone and design elements, published in Franses. M, Tapis Present de L’Orient A L’Occident, Paris, 1989, pp. 98 & 99. This is probably a larger town production and the motifs are arranged in a more linear fashion seeming to emulate architectural reliefs, a viewpoint shared by Oakley who likens to tilework in the Topkapi Palace and also refers to embroidery, op cit, p. 48, see Riefstahl. M., 'Primitive Rugs of the “Konya”' Type in the Mosque of Beyshehir' The Art Bulletin, vol. 13, No. 2, p. 201, figs. 19 & 22. However the field design of triangular palmettes organised into a ‘tête-bêche’ composition interspersed with vines and rosettes also in a ‘V’ shaped formation does bear a striking link to the offered work. It is interesting that in the entry for the Konya fragment it too is compared with Turkmenistan weaves and that the leaves and design format bear so much in common with the offered work.

1

1-0

1-1

1-9

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

1-6

1-7

1-8

 Lot 62. 'Emperor' silk carpet, Kum Kapi, Istanbul, Turkey, early 20th century after the original 16th century Persian, Safavid, design.; approximately 630 by 314cm; 20ft. 8in., 10ft. 3in. Estimate 200,000 — 300,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Knot density: V: 9/cm; H: 9/cm; the inner border with cartouches with inscriptions of Persian couplets in praise of the carpet and its patterns, with no date, the poets pen name may be ‘Homa' (not a recorded Safavid poet).

Note: The design elements of this present carpet are taken from one of the most complex and sophisticated groups of classical carpets of the early Safavid period in the 16th century. They have many features in common, being of elongated format and often more than twice as long as they are wide, with designs which incorporate motifs of palmettes, cloud-bands, realistic and mythical animals (dragons and Chinese antelope, ch'ilins, lion and buffalo, tigers and leopards, snakes, ducks and pheasants) and delicate layers of spiralling vines. They use many colours (often between fifteen and eighteen), and have structural similarities, including high knot counts (circa 200-325 knots per square inch) and asymmetrical knotting, the finest have silk warps and wefts. The 16th century pieces were attributed to eastern Iran, with Herat having been recorded as an important centre of court art and carpet production, during the Timurid period in the 15thcentury onwards, and although not all pieces originate from Herat (as some were from Isphahan and Kashan), the high quality of the 16th century pieces, does attribute them to being inspired by the designs of the Timurid period, extending into the early years of the 17th century. Seemingly contemporaneous carpets similar in pattern and style survive in multiple quality grades. It is not rare to find pairs of Persian carpets, and therefore has been suggested that it must have been widespread practice. However not all are of the same quality or warranted being diplomatic and royal gifts, and therefore copies of those that were would still hold some of the same prestige, by virtue of the quality of the piece alone, and a consideration for the present carpet.

This design type was comprehensively discussed by Christine Klose, in her ICOC paper presented in Istanbul, 2007 and posthumously published as ‘Imperial Puzzle, Sixteenth-century Persian spiral vine carpets with animals’, Hali, Issue 170, Winter 2011 , pp.76-85. In the group known as ‘spiral vine carpets’, nine of the group (I-IX) are known, based on five cartoon variations (A-E). Only three of the nine early pieces now survive and the most famous pair (Carpets I-II) are known as the ‘Emperors’ Carpets’, Iran (probably Herat), second half 16th century, asymmetrically knotted, silk warps and wefts, wool pile. (The third carpet, with cartoon B, is in poor condition: MAK: Vienna T 8376). It is the Emperors’ carpet design (with Cartoon A), and which are within their class considered supreme and possibly the earliest examples, that has inspired the composition of the presently offered carpet.

The ‘Emperors’ Carpets’, were purported to have been a diplomatic gift in 1698 from Tsar Peter the Great of Russia to the Holy Roman Emperor, Leopold I (1658-1705) to adorn his summer residence, and this companion pair were separated and are now located in different international museum respectively. One of the pair (744 by 350cm), originally in the Imperial Habsburg Collection is now in Vienna (Österreichisches Museum für angewandte Kunst: MAK), see Völker, Angela, Die orientalischen Knüpfteppiche im MAK, Böhlau, Wien- Köln- Wiemar, 2001, Cat.No.86, pp.244-247 (Inv. T8334 /1922). In 1925, on the fall of the Habsburgs, to raise funds the Viennese museum sold the other to the London dealers, Cardinal and Harford, and now the companion ‘Emperors’ carpet’, (751 by 330cm), is in the Metropolitan Museum of Art New York (Rogers Fund, 1943 – 43.121.1)

The Emperors’ Carpet group, the pair being the largest of the ‘spiral vine carpets’ with the finest drawing, have the distinctive design elements in a pattern that is symmetrical in all essential details, on both the vertical and horizontal axes, with each quadrant mirroring the others. This repeat suggests the weavers used a large and elaborate cartoon. The design is a refined overlaid series of arabesques, with palmettes and rosettes, together with cloud bands and pairs of birds, and various fighting animals, on a saturated red ground. They are juxtaposed over two delicate spiral vine systems in different colours and on different levels. In striking contrast the wide border against a green/indigo ground incorporates arabesques, exuberant cloudbands and spiral vines. The narrow outer border with red ground and cloudbands over a vine with flowers, and the inner border with yellow ground cartouches with inscriptions, alternating with palmette motifs. The present carpet shows some variation in composition, and is not an identical copy. It is however still of extraordinary quality and with silk pile, unlike the ‘Emperors’ Carpets’ which are wool.

Although the layers of symbolic meaning of these carpets, which were accessible to the Persian courtiers of the 16thcentury, linking the prestige of the cultural association with the metaphysical and mystic Sufi interpretations of the soul searching for God through poetry, may not be completely understood now, they do sometimes have inscriptions which assist with the understanding of the intentions of the carpets. These cited pair of comparable 16th century, silk ‘Emperor’ animal hunting carpets have calligraphic inscriptions within the cartouches in the narrow inner border, of a poem by the 13thcentury poet Zahir-al-Din Faryabi, in Nastaliq script, which praises nature, love and the King of the world, for whom the pair of carpets were made, and describes the carpets as a celestial meadow and invokes God’s blessing on the ruler. 

The present carpet, with all the similarities, in the overall design, and with calligraphic inscriptions in the inner border, against a saffron coloured ground, does not copy the same poem. Instead is an interpretation of the calligraphic inscription of Persian couplets in praise of the carpet and its patterns, found on another 16th century carpet, known as ‘The Darius of the World ‘Tiger’ carpet, with paradise park design, (504 by 225cm), in the Poldi Pezzoli Museum, Milan (Inv.no. 424.1855), circa 1560. It is considered to have been made for the Shah Tahmasps’ royal court, and then acquired in a private auction in 1855 by Gian Giacomo Poldi Pezzoli, and is one of the from another category of carpets known as the ‘Salting Group’, and incorporates a central medallion and metal thread highlights (originally gilt). This is one of only two complete 16th century Persian carpets that exist in Italian museums (the other also being in the Poldi Pezzoli Museum). Through the inscription it is considered ‘to have been conceived as a reflection of heaven, and to walk within in it is to enter Paradise on earth’ (see Franses, Michael, Curator of exhibition and catalogue, Il Giardino del Paradiso nel tappeto “del tigri” del Museo Poldi Pezzoli e nei tappet persiani del XVI secolo (The Garden of Paradise in the Poldi Pezzoli Museum ‘ Tiger’ Carpet and in 16th century Persian Carpets, Exhibition, 23rd May – 1st September 2014, Poldi Pezzoli Museum, Milan, pp.1-80, Darius of the World ‘Tiger Carpet’, Tavola 4, p.11, p.42-49, 75-77.

For a later example inspired by the ‘Emperors Carpet’ design, and signed, see a Teheran carpet, North Persia, circa 1900, Sotheby’s, London, 24 April 2013, lot 303, with similar field design, an alternative border type, and with calligraphic inscriptions limited to entablatures in the top corners of the borders, 'Work of Ustad (Master) Amir' and 'Order of Haji Yahuda’. 

This example is ascribed to the Istanbul Kum Kapi workshops.  The red kilim end finishes banded in golden yellow are a feature seen on Toussounian rugs, and this example may have been made under his oversight.  It is a remarkable tour-de-force to have woven a silk carpet which so accurately renders the original models  in such detail and fineness and on such a scale.  The Kum kapi workshops are known for their small silk rugs, and very occasionally produced small carpets.  A piece on this scale is an extraordinary rarity.

Bibliography: Alcouffe, Daniel, ed., Great Carpets of the World, Chp.IV, The Carpets of Safavid Persia: Gardens of Earthly Delight, Paris, 1996, No.101, pg.130. 

Bennet, Ian, ‘The Emperors’ old carpets’, Hali, July-August-September, 1986, pp.11-19

Denny, Walter B. ‘Textiles and Carpets in the Metropolitan Museum's New ALTICALSA Galleries’. Arts of Asia 2012 (2012). p. 105, ill. figs. 7, 8. Provenance of Emperor Carpet Czar Peter the Great, Russia (by tradition, until 1698); Austrian Imperial House, Vienna (1698–1921); Österreichisches Museum für Kunst und Industrie (1921–25; to Cardinal and Harford); [Cardinal and Harford, London, 1925–28; sale, Christie, Manson & Wood, London, July 5, 1928, no. 146]; [ International Art Gallery, London, 1928, sold to Arthur U. Pope for Rockefeller McCormick]; Edith Rockefeller McCormick, Chicago (1928–d. 1932; her estate until 1943; sold to Arthur U. Pope for the Metropolitan Museum of Art). 

Denny, Walter B, How to Read Islamic Carpets. New Haven and London: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2014.p.118, illus. pp. 120-121, figs. 104-105. 

Denny, Walter B, Emperor’s carpet’, Hali, Issue 170, Winter 2011 , pp.74-75. 

Ekhtiar, Maryam, Sheila R. Canby, Navina Haidar, and Priscilla P. Soucek, ed. Masterpieces from the Department of Islamic Art in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 1st ed. ed. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2011. no. 181, pp. 6,12,17, 172, 259-261, ill. p. 260 (color), fig. 18 (b/w).

Ellis, Charles, Oriental Carpets in the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia,1988. p. 171. 

Ellis, Charles Grant, ‘Some Compartment Designs for Carpets, and Herat’, Textile Museum Journal 1, no. 4 (December 1965), pp. 42–56, pp. 42, 43, figs. 1, 2, and p. 52, fig. 15. Franses, Michael, Curator of exhibition and catalogue, Il Giardino del Paradiso nel tappeto “del tigri” del Museo Poldi Pezzoli e nei tappet persiani del XVI secolo (The Garden of Paradise in the Poldi Pezzoli Museum ‘ Tiger’ Carpet and in 16th century Persian Carpets, Exhibition, 23rd May – 1st September 2014, Poldi Pezzoli Museum, Milan, pp.1-80, Darius of the World ‘Tiger Carpet’, Tavola 4, p.11, p.42-49, 75-77. 

Franses, Michael, ‘Out of the shadow’, Hali, Issue 179, Spring 2014, pp.80-85, for discussion on the Darius of the Universe carpet in the Poldi Pozzoli Museum, Milan. 

Klose, Klose, ICOC paper presented in Istanbul, 2007 and posthumously published ‘Imperial Puzzle, Sixteenth-century Persian spiral vine carpets with animals’, Hali, Issue 170, Winter 2011 , pp.76-85. 

Pope, Arthur Upham, A Survey of Persian Art: from Prehistoric times to the present, Vol. VIII, plates 981-1275, Textiles, Carpets, Oxford University Press, London & New York, 1939, vii, East Persia, floral and animal carpet, pl. 1174 (b/w - section of floral and animal carpet, East Persia, 2nd quarter 16th century, Estate of Mrs. Rockefeller McCormick. (L.whole carpet) 24ft 8 in (750cm). W. 10ft 6 in (320cm).

Sarre, Friedrich, and Trenkwald, Hermann, Alt Orientalische Teppiche, Leipzig, 1926-1929, Vol. I, Vol. II. Pl.29. 

Welch, Stuart Cary. The Islamic World. Vol. 11. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1987. pp. 98-100, ill. fig. 74 (colour).

1

1-0

1-1

1-2

1-3

Lot 58. A pashmina cartouche compartment rug, probably Srinagar, Kashmir, late 19th-early 20th century; approximately 123 by 81cm; 4ft., 2ft. 8in. Estimate 18,000 — 25,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Knot density: V: 22-23/cm; H: 18/cm; silk foundation; after a Safavid compartment design, of superlative fineness, probably intended as an exhibition piece

ProvenanceSotheby’s, London, 13th April 1988, lot 84.

Note: The compartment distinctive design of the present rug, with its interlocking geometric star pattern comprised of radiating cartouches, enclosing and exotic animals, such as dragons, simurghs, Ch’i lins and phoenixes, incorporates design elements taken from Chinese and Islamic motifs. It is inspired by two recorded examples in museum collections, both from Central Iran, 15th or early 16th century, and considered to have originally been a pair. The first comparable is a complete carpet known as ‘The Baron Compartment with Dragon and Phoenix Carpet’, (800 by 400cm), wool pile on a silk foundation, in the Musée Historique des Tissus, Lyon, no.25.423 (Formerly S. Baron, Paris, 1893), and the other comparable originally woven from the same cartoon, is ‘The Robinson Compartment with Dragon and Phoenix Carpet’, first half 16thcentury, Iran (possibly Tabriz), (reduced in size 497 by 340cm), wool pile on silk foundation, asymmetrically knotted, in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Frederick C. Hewitt Fund, 1910 -10.61.3). Similarities to the Safavid bookbindings have been noted, in the format and in the use of the Chinese cloud bands and Islamic cartouches as motif elements. The offered miniature rug is likely to be from an extraordinary group of 20th century Indian weavings. It has been executed with extraordinary dexterity, with a high knot count and small scale of the motifs. The presence of the pashmina wool suggests a Kashmir origin. The presence of elephants within the curvilinear compartments against the dark brown ground in the design may well be an Indian adaptation, for in the cited 16th century examples the same compartments have a spotted wild cat motif . The present rug is a copy of the shortened carpet in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. 

For comparable miniature compartment rugs, see Sotheby’s, London, 20th October 1993, lot 97, probably 1930 (105 by 79cm), knot density V 17-19/cm: H 16/cm, and another example with a finer knot count, in the same auction, Sotheby’s, London, 20th October 1993, lot 109, after 1928, (129 by 75cm), knot density V 19-20/cm: H 18/cm This piece also had a label stating that it was made by Mohd Rahim for C.M. Hadow & Co. in Srinagar, in Kashmir, which was a factory know particularly for copies of Polonaise rugs. Carpets of this group are represented by their extremely high knot counts (V 15-16/cm: H 18/cm). The Metropolitan carpet was first illustrated by John Kimberley Mumford, in The Yerkes Collection of Oriental Carpets, 1910, pl.XXV, and the Lyon example was published in 1900 by the director of the museum, Raymond Cox. It was then possible to produce cartoons, and a number of copies were produced in different locations, including several factories in India, and they were possibly produced in jail or private workshops, in Agra, Lahore and Amritsar. It was noted in government sponsored reports on Indian weaving in the late 19th and early 20th century, of the occasional use of pashmina wool at this date, and that examples are ‘excessively rare’ (see Marketplace, Hali, 39, pp.92-93). It is highly probably that this piece was intended as an exhibition piece.

For a carpet offered in this sale, taken from the design of a famous pair of 16th century Persian, known as 'The Emperors' carpets', see lot 62.

Bibliography: Ian Bennett, ‘Splendours in the City of Silk, Hali, Issue 32, 1986, pp.42-48; Ian Bennett, ‘Splendours in the City of Silk, part 2 ‘The Safavid Masterpieces’, Hali, Issue 33, 1987, pp.38-49 and Ian Bennett, ‘Splendours in the City of Silk, part 3: ‘The Safavid Masterpieces’, Hali, Issue 34, 1987, pp.42-43, pl.XI, and p.103 (with structure analysis);
Brown‚ David J, ‘Carpets from the Hadow Factory in Kashmir’, Hali, 3/3, 1981, p.219;
Erdmann, Seven Hundred Years of Oriental Carpets, London, 1970, p.182, pl. XIX (detail);
Klose, Christine, ‘Traces of Timurid carpets in contemporary and later carpets from the Near East, pp.72-89, p.72, fig.1, frontispiece, & Safavid carpets with cartouche patterns, pp.82-86, fig. 26, Thompson, Jon, Shaffer, Daniel, Mildh, Pirjetti, (ed), Carpets and Textiles in the Iranian World 1400-1700, Proceedings of the Conference held at the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, 30-31 August 2003, for The May Beattie Archive, Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford, in association with The Bruschettini Foundation for Islamic and Asian Art, Genoa, 2010;
Mumford, John Kimberley, The Yerkes Collection of Oriental Carpets, 1910, pl. XXV.

1

1-0

1-1

1-2

Lot 63. From the Alexander Collection. A Khorossan carpet fragment, Northeast Persia, 17th century; overall dimensions of fragment approximately 249 by 68cm; 8ft. 2in., 2ft. 3in. Estimate 7,000 — 10,000 GBPCourtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Provenanceacquired from Eskenazi Ltd, London, 1984

Literature: Bennett, I., 'The Alexander Collection: Part II A carpet is a Picture of God', Hali, April/May 1994, issue 74, p. 93, fig. 10.

Alexander, C., A Foreshadowing of 21st Century Art The Color and Geometry of Very Early Turkish Carpets, New York, 1993, pp. 238 - 239, ill pp. 13 (detail) & 239.

Eskenazi. J., Il tappeto orientale dal XV al XVIII secolo, London, 1982, pp. 28, tavaola. 46.

Related LiteratureMcMullan, Joseph, Islamic Carpets, New York, 1965, pp. 164 – 172, plate. 41

Note: The immediate vibrancy of this fragment is staggering, so much so that Alexander places it as early as at least late 14thcentury due to the spectacular colouring and Ian Bennett singles it out in his article, op cit, p. 93. Alexander cites the Tabriz carpet  which he believes to be a century later than the offered lot but ‘is readily’ accepted as 15th century. See Alexander, op cit, p. 121, Sotheby’s London, 7 November 2017, lot 78, catalogued as 16th century. He however owns that there are others, Eskenazi included, who assign it as 17th century and so within the chronological ordering of the book it appears later than the Tabriz– Alexander, ibid, p. 239 and Eskenzi, op cit, pp. 46 & 47. Faced with the other works within the Alexander Collection it should be somewhat acknowledged that dating becomes both complicated and less relevant, than perhaps with other works, with these extraordinary unusual and colourful pieces. With this in mind we have catalogued it as 17th century, in keeping with contemporaneous viewpoints and ascribed Khorossan as the weaving centre in accordance with the jufti knotting, but do acknowledge this fragment could be older than this dating.

There is a companion piece, almost certainly from the same carpet, recorded in the Museum of Egyptian Antiquities and both discussed and corroborated by Ian Bennett, op cit, pp. 93 & 94 and pictured Eskenazi, op cit, p. 47, fig. 3. In 2006 Daniel Walker discussed the Khorossan group in further depth in his review of the Textile Museum exhibition ‘Pieces of a Puzzle: Classical Persian Carpet Fragments’ and cites a number of examples. Three of which, at that time, were in private collections and share some similar motifs and colours to the present lot; notably the red outlining to the motifs and the vibrant white ‘hand-like’ palmettes, see Walker. D., ‘Carpets of Khorasan’ Hali, November –December 2006, issue 149. pp. 72 - 77, figs. 5, 7 & 8.

1-3

Fig. 1. The ‘Niğde’ Carpet, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, accession no 56.217, formerly in the collection of Joseph McMullan.

1-4

Fig. 2. The ‘Niğde’ Carpet, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, accession no 56.217, formerly in the collection of Joseph McMullan, (detail).

Perhaps the most compelling of comparisons is the so called ‘Niğde Carpet’ formerly in the McMullan collection and now in the Metropolitan Museum, New York, figs 1 & 2. This carpet was initially catalogued as Caucasian, see McMullan, J., Islamic Carpets, New York, 1965, pp. 164 – 172, plate. 41, but now is attributed to Northwest Persia, accession no 56.217. Under inspection the ‘Niğde’ becomes more symbiotic with the present lot: in the use of white ‘hand-like’ palmettes, field rosettes, saz leaf design, bright yellows and blues, the red cloudbands encapsulated in a lozenge with outline centred by open rosettes. The design layout of these works is near identical and it is possible that they were drawn from the same cartoon even though their border designs are entirely different.

1

1-0

1-1

1-2

1-3

Lot 21. A Yomut main carpet, West Turkestan, first half 19th century; with 'kepse' güls, approximately 311 by 172cm; 10ft. 2in., 2ft. 4inEstimate 8,000 — 12,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018. 

Note: The present Yomut main carpet, or khali, presents a number of highly unusual traits for this particular group of weavings. For example ‘sheaf’, or kepse, güls are often seen within the group, but the arrangement of diagonal rows in three colourways - blue, green and then white - is more unusual and lends additional dynamism to the field. A simpler arrangement of white alternating with a colour is more usual, see Mackie. L., Thompson. J. (ed.), Turkmen Tribal Carpets and Traditions, Washington 1980, pp. 153 & 155, pl. 65.   The border design is also uncommon and seems to draw inspiration from a number of other Turkmen sources. For example the hooked and stepped güls can also be seen in the border guards of Tekke Torbas, examples can be seen Mackie. L., Thompson. J. (ed.), ibid, pp. 108 & 109, pls. 36 & 37, and sometimes in Chodor main carpets, p. 122. One Yomut main carpet shares a related border design and again published, ibid, p.156, pl. 67, and an example with similar meandering serrated vines sold Christie’s London, 26 October 2017, lot 270. However the inclusion of the ‘C’ gül motifs within the border of the present lot is extremely unusual, although they are sometimes found within the kepse güls of main carpets. Two further irregularities can be noted in the present lot: the first the employment of an elem design more associated with Yomut Ensis, see Loges. W., Turkoman Tribal Rugs, New York, 1980, pp. 78 & 79, pl. 40. The other is the charming inclusion of the chequerboard motif in the corner of one elem. 

Sotheby's. Rugs and Carpets: Including Distinguished Collections, London, 23 Apr 2018, 02:30 PM

A Mughal nobleman riding through a landscape holding a hawk, India, Deccan, Bijapur, circa 1660-80

$
0
0

1

1-0

Lot 86. A Mughal nobleman riding through a landscape holding a hawk, India, Deccan, Bijapur, circa 1660-80, gouache and gold on paper, depicting a mounted nobleman holding a hawk on his right hand, a retinue with elephant following, within a landscape, inscription to the reverse; 18.4 by 27.4cm. Estimate 70,000 — 90,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Note: This is an important and rare equestrian portrait painted at Bijapur during the third quarter of the seventeenth century.

It is close in style and palette to the well-known dynastic durbar scene The House of Bijapur by Kamal Muhammad and Chand Muhammad in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (1982.213; see Zebrowski 1983, pl.XVII, Welch 1985, no.208, Haidar and Sardar 2011, frontispiece and cover detail). Indeed, the execution of the horse, the rocks and the trees in that work is very close to those in the present example. It also relates stylistically to other Bijapur works, including A Princely Deer Hunt, datable to circa 1660, in which the horses and palette again relate to the present work (see Welch 1985, no.207; Zebrowski 1983, no.115), and Sultan Muhammad Adil Shah before a distant vista, a mid-seventeenth century work by Muhammad Khan, son of Miyan Chand, where the background hills and trees are close to the present example (see Zebrowski 1983, no.94).

The identity of the mounted figure here is uncertain. By the time this work was painted, the Mughal overlordship of the Deccan was well-established and Mughal princes and officers were frequent visitors and residents. Furthermore, Mughal artistic influence was assimilated into Deccani art. The facial type of the main figure, as well as the composition in general, is clearly influenced by the Mughal school (for a closely related Mughal equestrian hawking scene of the same period in the India Office Library Collections, British Library, see Falk and Archer 1981, p.410, no103; Losty and Leach, no.11). The figure wears a beard of a distinctly Mughal fashion associated with the reign of Shah Jahan and the early years of Aurangzeb's reign.

An inscription on the reverse gives the name Ja'far Khan. There were several noblemen and courtiers of the Shah Jahan and Awrangzeb periods with this name, but the two most likely are the Ja'far Khan who was Mir Bakhshi from 1647 onwards, and the Ja'far Khan who was Umdat al-Mulk, minister and governor towards the end of Shah Jahan's reign and Grand Vizier under Awrangzeb. A portrait of the former, by Chitarman of circa 1645 (British Museum, 1920,0917,0.13.36, see Beach and Koch 1997, fig.114, p.192) shows him to have had a similar physiognomy to the present figure, and other portraits of him, including numerous appearances in groups scenes in the Padshahnama and related works, confirm the similarity, albeit occasionally with a straighter nose (see Beach and Koch 1997, pages as indexed) . The latter is shown in a Deccani portrait of circa 1670 in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin (69.8, see Leach 1995, vol.II, pp.951-2, no.9.682, p.955, col.pl.138). The Deccani origin of this seated portrait perhaps provides a link to the present work, also of Deccani origin; however, even allowing for the much greater age of the sitter, the facial features are less akin, leaving the former courtier as the more likely match.

Since the inscription on the reverse has probably been written somewhat later than the execution of the painting itself, it is also possible that the figure here is meant to depict someone else, perhaps a royal figure, and it is worth noting that a closely related drawing of Shah Jahan carrying a hawk as he processes across a landscape with his army is in the Freer Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. (F1907.196, see http://www.asia.si.edu/collections/zoomObject.cfm?ObjectId=3416, where it is described as Mughal, although it is quite possibly Deccani in origin). The prince with the closest facial characteristics is Prince Dara Shikoh, Shah Jahan’s eldest son and heir apparent, who is often shown with a very slightly more convex line to his nose, and with the same type of Shah Jahan-fashion beard as seen here (see, for instance: Dara Shikoh (one of four portraits on an album page), Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., S1986.421, see Beach 2012, no.22I; Shah Jahan Receiving Dara Shikoh, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, M.83.105.21, see Pal 1993, pp.282-3, (which clearly shows the slight difference between Dara Shikoh's visage and Shah Jahan's); Dara Shikoh with a Tray of Jewels, Victoria and Albert Museum, IM 19-1925, see Stronge 2002, pl.115; Dara Shikoh with Mian Mir and Mulla Shah, Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., S1986.432, see Beach 2012, no.36; Dara Shikoh and Sulaiman Shikoh, sale in these rooms, 16 June 2009, lot 2; Portrait of Dara Shikoh, Christie’s, London, 10 October 2006, lot 166). A further very close resemblance can be seen in a small portrait in the Dyson Perrins album, included in this sale as lot 102. Dara Shikoh’s brother, Prince Shah Shuja, also has the very slightly convex nose profile (see a portrait in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, Leach 1995, no.3,82, Wright 2008, no.81), and he is also a possible candidate for the subject here. However, if the painting does show a royal prince, which the symbolism of the mounted, hawking figure might imply, it is slightly odd that he is depicted without a nimbus, which portraits of royal princes of the Mughal dynasty would normally have. Thus the probability remains that it does indeed depict one of the senior Mughal courtiers named Ja'far Khan.

Sotheby's. Arts of the Islamic World, London, 25 Apr 2018, 10:30 AM

Firdausi (d.1020 AD), Shahnameh, Persia, Qazwin, Safavid, dated 985 AH/1577 AD

$
0
0

1

1-0

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

1-6

Lot 68. Firdausi (d.1020 AD), Shahnameh, Persia, Qazwin, Safavid, dated 985 AH/1577 AD. Estimate 30,000 — 50,000 GBP. Courtesy Sotheby's 2018.

Persian manuscript on paper, 472 leaves plus 3 fly-leaves, 25 lines to the page text arranged in 4 columns, written in nasta’liq in black ink, titles in gold, f.3b and 4a with gold and polychrome shamsas followed by an opening bifolium with 12 lines of nasta’liq within clouds against a gold ground, surrounded by polychrome and gold scrolls against a blue ground, 22 miniature paintings, in contemporaneous gilt-stamped Safavid binding with fine polychrome doublures, with flap; text panel: 23 by 13.8cm. leaf: 35.7 by 23.6cm. 

ProvenanceChristie's, London, 11 July 1974, lot 8.

Note: This finely illuminated manuscript contains 22 illustrations as follows:

F.1b &2a: two paintings depicting a banquet
F.15b: Jamshid teaching the crafts
F.28b: Tur slays his brother Iris
F.34b: Manuchihr kills Salm
F.64b: The battle of Turanians and Persians: Rustam carries off Afrasiyab’s crown and girdle
F.72b: Rustam kills the white div
F.93b: Rustam slays his his son Sohrab
F.101b: The fire ordeal of Siyavush
F.135b: A party scene
F.174b: Rustam pulls Khaqan off his elephant with his kamund
F.181b: Rustam slays Puladwand
F.217b: Rustam spares Barzu
F.232b: Rustam witnesses an execution
F.272b: Rustam shoots Shughad through a tree from the pit
F.290b: Kay Khosrow puts to death Gersiwaz and Afrasiyab
F.306b: Gushtasp slays the dragon
F.331b: Shidah’s head being cut off after his defeat in wrestling with Kay Khusraw
F.347b: Arjasp killed by Isfendi
F.380b: A battle scene  
F.404b: The execution of Faramurz by Bahman
F.457b: The fight between Iskandar and Fur.

Sotheby's. Arts of the Islamic World, London, 25 Apr 2018, 10:30 AM

Iznik pottery at Sotheby's London, 25 April 2018

$
0
0

119771955

Lot 167. A unique blue and white pilgrim flask with animals, Turkey, circa 1545-55; 32.2cm. height. Est. 60,000-80,000Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

Cf. my post: Sotheby's announces highlights from the Arts of the Islamic World auction on 25 April

1-0

Lot 175. An Iznik polychrome pottery tile, Turkey, second half 16th century; 25.5 by 24.5cm. Estimate 25,000 — 35,000 GBPCourtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

of square form, decorated in underglaze cobalt blue, green and relief red, featuring carnations and saz leaves, mounted.

Provenance: Sotheby's, London, 14 April 2010, lot 325, previously in a French private collection since the 1970s.

Note: This tile would have formed part of a larger installation; an identical example is in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, inv. no.EAX.3215.

1-1

Lot 172. An Iznik polychrome pottery dish, Turkey, circa 1575-80; 29.6cm. diam. Estimate 10,000 — 15,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

of shallow rounded form, decorated in underglaze cobalt blue, emerald green and relief red with thin black outlines, featuring lotus blossoms and saf leaves, rim with breaking wave motif, reverse with flower heads and tulips.

ProvenanceChristie's, Iznik Pottery: The Vincent Bulent Collection, 26 April 2005, lot 8.
Alfred Spiro, Kensington Church Street, 1949, as per an old collection label to underside: 'Plat Rhodes achete par M.... en Decembre 1949 chez Spiro, Londres'.

1-2

Lot 171. An Iznik polychrome pottery dish, Turkey, circa 1570-80; 30cm. diam. Estimate 8,000 — 12,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

of shallow rounded form, decorated in underglaze cobalt blue, green and relief red with thin black outlines, featuring a central bouquet of carnations surrounded by prunus and hyacinth stems, the rim with a breaking wave motif, reverse with flower heads, old collection number.

ProvenanceEx-private collection, Europe, pre-1960s.

 

1-3

Lot 174. An Iznik polychrome pottery dish, Turkey, late 16th century; 29.5cm. diam. Estimate 4,000 — 6,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

decorated in underglaze cobalt and grey blue, viridian green and relief red, outlined in black, with palmettes to centre surrounded by lobed arches, scrolling-wave rim, the exterior plain.

Provenance: Sotheby’s, London, 29 April 1992, lot 69.

1-4

Lot 170. An Iznik polychrome pottery dish with gold highlights, Turkey, 17th century; 28cm. diam. Estimate 3,000 — 5,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

decorated with tulips, rosettes, florettes and a saz leaf in underglaze cobalt blue, green and relief red with black outlines, geometric arch designs to rim, gold highlights added to rosettes, reverse with foliate details.

1-5

Lot 168. An Iznik polychrome pottery dish, Turkey, 17th century; 29.2cm. diam. Estimate 3,000 — 5,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

decorated in underglaze blue, light green and relief red with black outlines, stylised breaking wave pattern to the rim and floral sprays comprising hyacinths, tulips and carnations, reverse with foliate details and a unique figure-of-eight mark, possibly a potter's mark.

Provenance: Sotheby’s, London, 29 April 1992, lot 74.

1-6

Lot 169. A large Iznik polychrome pottery dish, Turkey, 17th century; 35cm. diamEstimate 2,000 — 3,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

decorated in underglaze blue, light green, orange-red with black outlines, with a large saz leaf containing florettes, carnations, hyacinths, and tulips, scrolling-wave border, reverse with floral motifs.

Provenance: Sotheby’s, London, 29 April 1992, lot 73.

1-7

Lot 187. An Iznik-style pottery tile, probably Turkey, early 20th century; 38.8 by 28cmEstimate 2,000 — 3,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

of rectangular form, decorated in underglaze cobalt blue, green, aubergine purple and relief red with black outlines, with a decor comprising stylised lotus blossoms, split-palmettes, saz leaves and Chinoiserie scrolls, set on custom metal mount.

Provenance: Christie's London, 26 April 1994, lot 369

Sotheby's. Arts of the Islamic World, London, 25 Apr 2018, 10:30 AM

Indian Jewelry at Sotheby's London, 25 Apr 2018

$
0
0

1-0

1-1

Lot 155. A gem-set and enamelled necklace, earrings and ring, India, circa 19th century. Estimate 10,000 — 15,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018. 

 the gold necklace composed of rectangular beads each depicting a flower with a central diamond set in the kundan technique, red enamel petals against a green criss-cross design, the reverse enamelled with red and green floral blossoms on a white ground, with hanging gem-set and seed pearl beads, matching pendant earrings, together with a large bulbous ring set with a carved emerald and polychrome enamel body; necklace: 23cm. length; each earring: 6cm; interior of ring: 1.7cm. diam. 

1-2

Lot 157. A gem-set and enamelled necklace, India, 19th century. Estimate 10,000 — 15,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

comprising alternating diamonds, and rubies or spinels set in gold with foil backing, on flexible linked chain with hanging drops, enamelled on the reverse in red, green and blue with a flower on each setting, string strap with seed pearl terminals; 30.2cm. length of row of gemstones.

 

1-6

1-3

1-4

1-5

Lot 153. A fine Mughal gem-set inscribed jade pendant, North India, 18th-19th century. Estimate 8,000 — 12,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018.

the jade pendant of lobed form, one side inlaid with gold and highlighted with inset foil-backed green stones and diamonds with a crescent moon amongst floral and bird motifs, the reverse featuring an incised calligraphic medallion within an inscribed border, gold floral motifs along the edges, with a green and metal-thread necklace; pendant: 5 by 5.8cm.

Inscriptions:
In the centre: The Shahada
In the borders: The nada ‘Ali quatrain, followed by: 'There is no youth [as brave as] ‘Ali, no sword [as sharp as] dhu’l-faqar
And invocation to God as: ‘O the Judge of needs! O Sufficient of necessities! O the Healer of ailments!’

1-7

Lot 156. A diamond-set and enamelled necklace and earrings, India, 20th century. Estimate 6,000 — 8,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018. 

comprised of facet-cut diamonds set in gold with foil backing on linked chains, with a hanging pendant in the form of a stylised flowerhead, enamelled on the reverse in red, green, yellow, blue and white with foliate details on each setting, gold chain, together with a pair of matching earrings, in bespoke box. Quantity: 3 - diamond section: 23cm. max. length - each earring: 6.2cm. 

1-8

Lot 158. A pair of large gem-set earrings with seed pearls, India, late 19th-early 20th century. Estimate 5,000 — 8,000. Courtesy Sotheby’s 2018. 

each of openwork design, with a flowerhead ear-piece with hanging drop and crescent-shape containing two facing birds, gemstones set with foil-backing, seed-pearl fringes, attachment string. Quantity: 2 - each earring: 13cm. with string: 23.2cm. 

Note: Stylistically, these earrings share a similar design with a nose-ring (balu) in the National Museum, New Delhi (inv. no.87.1168), attributed to Himachal Pradesh, early twentieth century (Krishan and Kumar 2001, p.177, no.276). 

Sotheby's. Arts of the Islamic World, London, 25 Apr 2018, 10:30 AM

 

Viewing all 36084 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>