Quantcast
Channel: Alain.R.Truong
Viewing all 36084 articles
Browse latest View live

A very rare Imperial amber-inlaid gilt-bronze 'dragon and twelve chilong' box and cover, 18th century

$
0
0

0

1

2

3

Lot 20. A very rare Imperial amber-inlaid gilt-bronze 'dragon and twelve chilong' box and cover, 18th century; 17.7cm (7in) wide (2). Estimate HK$ 1,500,000 - 2,000,000 (€ 160,000 - 220,000)© Bonhams 2001-2018

The cover exquisitely set with a large central hexagonal cushioned amber panel superbly carved in low relief with a front-facing five-clawed sinuous dragon amidst undulating cloud scrolls encircling a stylised shoucharacter, surrounded by six trapezoidal cushioned amber plaques each crisply carved with a stylised writhing chi dragon with its extremities carved in the form of lingzhi fungus, the box similarly inset on each side with similarly decorated amber panels, all framed by twist-rope gilt-bronze borders, the interior lined with yellow silk. 

Note: This exceptionally rare box and cover is an outstanding example of boxes made in the Imperial Palace Workshop, the Zaobanchu, under the supervision of the Neiwufu Imperial Household Department, which was in charge of the management of provisions for the Court. The Zaobanchu was responsible for the making of items for the personal use of the emperor and his family, ensuring that the exacting Imperial standards and the Court taste for opulence will be met. The present box is a testament to the superb craftsmanship and technical perfection achieved during the 18th century.

The decorative motifs of the five-clawed full-facing dragon encircled by twelve chi dragons, all around the shou character, indicate that this box was most likely specially commissioned for an Imperial birthday; see a related coral on gold peach-shaped box and cover, 1790, commissioned by Court official for the Qianlong emperor for his eightieth birthday, from the Qing Court Collection, in the Palace Museum, Beijing, carved with writhing dragons encircling a shou character, illustrated by E.S.Rawski and J.Rawson, eds., China: The Three Emperors 1662-1722, London, 2005, p.374, no.294. 

Amber was a highly revered material and would have required great skill and precision to successfully render the shape of the cushion as well as the finely detailed decorations of each dragon. Amber is also known as hu po, which can be translated as 'the tiger's soul'. As tiger is considered to be the king of beasts in China, amber is therefore associated with the strong qualities of the tiger including the ability to capture and chase away evil spirits. It also symbolises longevity as it is associated with the resin of the pine tree, as does the shou character, which is carved at the very heart of the design. The master craftsman chose to complement the natural golden honey-tone of the amber with the gilt-bronze borders, exemplifying Qing Imperial opulence.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY


A very fine Imperial Ming-style blue and white vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

$
0
0

A very fine Imperial Ming-style blue and white vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

1

30

4

2

Lot 47. A very fine Imperial Ming-style blue and white vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795); 28.6cm (11 1/4in) high (2). Estimate HK$ 1,800,000 - 2,400,000 (€ 200,000 - 260,000). Unsold. © Bonhams 2001-2018

Of elegant pear-shaped form, rising to a wide trumpet mouth, brilliantly painted around the exterior in vivid tones of cobalt-blue with a fenced garden enclosing plantain and bamboo growing beside pierced rockwork on grassy mounds, all beneath a border of upright elongated plantain leaves, scrolling tendrils and a pendant ruyi collar, the base with a band of lotus lappets above nine lotus blooms at the splayed foot, box. 

ProvenanceAcquired in Philadelphia in the 1940s-50s, by repute
An Irish private collection, Co. Carlow
Bonhams London, 11 November 2010, lot 312
A distinguished Asian private collection.

NoteThe present vase is possibly the finest example of its type, displaying superb painting in vibrant and vivid cobalt blue. 

The design of bamboo, plantain and rocks has been much favoured by Chinese literati on account of its auspicious connotations. Bamboo symbolises longevity, endurance and loyalty, as it does not break in the wind and remains green in winter. The plantain tree is a symbol of education from the classical legend of a scholar who wrote on plantain leaves since he was too poor to afford any paper, hence much admired by the Chinese for its fruit and large ornamental leaf. Rocks represent durability and steadfastness and thus are symbols of reliability and friendship.

The decoration of the present lot is found on porcelains as early as the Hongwu period, and vases of closely related form and design are known from the Yongle reign: see a vase from the Qing Court Collection, illustrated in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum: Blue and White Porcelain with Underglaze Red (I), Hong Kong, 2000, no.33. This form and design were revived during the Qing period, within the framework of Imperial Qing porcelain commissions reproducing forms and designs of early Ming ceramics; see a blue and white vase, yuhuchunping, Yongzheng six-character mark and period, which was sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 2 May 2005, lot 511. 

The present lot, distinguished in its elegant potting, impressive use of cobalt blue and refined delicacy from the early Ming examples, represents the height of the Qianlong period porcelain manufacture at the Imperial kilns in Jingdezhen. Several similar examples, Qianlong seal mark and period, are in important museum collections; see one in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, illustrated in Porcelain of the National Palace Museum. Blue and White Wares of the Ch'ing Dynasty, vol.2, Hong Kong, 1968, pl.12; another in the Palace Museum, Beijing, illustrated in Gu tao ci zi liao xuan cui, vol.2, Beijing, 2005, pl.181; and a further example illustrated in Chinese Porcelain. The S. C. Ko Tianminlou Collection, vol. 1, Hong Kong, 1987, pl.62.

A similar blue and white vase, yuhuchunping, Qianlong seal mark and period, was sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 8 October 2010, lot 2773.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

A large guan-type vase, hu, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

$
0
0

A large guan-type vase, hu, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

0

Lot 48. A large Guan-type vase, hu, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795); 51.7cm (20 1/2in) high. Estimate HK$ 200,000 - 300,000 (€ 22,000 - 33,000)Sold for HK$ 500,000 (€ 54,732) inc. premium. © Bonhams 2001-2018

Robustly potted with an angular sloping shoulder rising from a short splayed foot to a waisted neck encircled by a raised horizontal rib, flanked atop by a pair of tubular handles, covered overall with an even sea-green glaze suffused with colourless and subtle russet crackles, the unglazed foot rim covered with a dark brown dressing.  

ProvenanceA Japanese private collection, by repute.

Notehe present vase exemplifies the Qianlong Emperor's fascination with archaism and innovation, greatly inspired in its glaze from the subtle Imperial Southern Song dynasty Guan glaze, yet reinterpreting it in this impressive size and form drawing from archaic bronze hu vessels, thus reflecting the trend of innovation within tradition, which took place during the Yongzheng reign and continued in the Qianlong reign. In addition to the Guan glaze, the Ge, Ru and Jun glazes of the Song dynasty were particularly popular where the Qianlong Emperor not only collected them but also commissioned porcelain using the similar glaze for his appreciation. To produce a vase of this demanding form and monumental size would have required considerable expertise from the Jingdezhen potters, thus the present lot is an outstanding example of the skilful workmanship achieved during the Qianlong reign. 

Only a few vases of this size and shape appear to have been published. Compare a Qianlong mark and period Guan-type vase of similar size and shape sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 8 April 2013, lot 3051. See also two Qianlong vases of this form but covered in a Ru-type and Ge-type glaze respectively, sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 31 May 2010, lot 2010 and Christie's New York, 21 September 2004, lot 315. Further compare a café-au-lait-glazed hu vase of similar size and shape from the Qing Court Collection, see The Complete Collection of the Treasures of the Palace Museum. Monochrome Porcelain, Hong Kong, 1999, pl.61.

For various forms of Yongzheng and Qianlong vases covered in a comparable Ge-type glaze from the Qing Court Collection in the Palace Museum, Beijing, see ibid., pls. 204 and 208.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

Ikebana by Toshiro Kawase

Lost masterpiece by Antonio Canova appears at auction

$
0
0

0

Antonio Canova (1757-1822), Bust of Peace. White marble. Courtesy Sotheby's

LONDON.- The artist behind one of the most celebrated sculptures in Britain, The Three Graces, Antonio Canova (1757-1821) is as revered today as he was during his lifetime. Honoured in verse by Lord Byron, Canova was considered the preeminent sculptor of his time, recognised not only for his skills as a carver, but also as a diplomat and dignitary for the Papal court. 

Now, on 4 July in London, Sotheby’s will offer one of the few autograph works by Canova ever to come to auction. Long thought lost, the Bust of Peace has not been seen in public for over 200 years since it was shown for the first time at the Royal Academy summer exhibition of 1817. 

The sculpture belongs to Canova’s celebrated series of Ideal Heads (Teste Ideale). Considered among the artist’s most intimate works, the Ideal Heads embody Canova’s ideal of beauty, and were developed with the express purpose of gifting them to friends and patrons. The Bust of Peace (1814) was carved for his first British patron and close friend John Campbell, Lord Cawdor, in thanks for his long term patronage and friendship, and in part for his help in repatriating art from Italy looted by the French armies during the Napoleonic Wars. 

Having been passed down through five generations of the Cawdor family following John Campbell’s death in 1821, the sculpture was forgotten over time. By 1962, when the contents of the family house Stackpole Court in Pembrokeshire were sold at auction, the Bust of Peace was simply described in the catalogue as ‘a white marble bust of a lady wearing a diadem’. 

Now, following extensive research by the present owner, who acquired the sculpture as an unattributed work, the bust has been identified as the long-lost Bust of Peace by Canova. The masterful work is a significant rediscovery, of seminal importance within Canova’s oeuvre, and has great historical resonance. 

Christopher Mason, Director, Sotheby’s European Sculpture & Works of Art Department, said: “This is one of the most exciting rediscoveries I have encountered, the culmination of years spent piecing together fragments of information that together now tell the complete story of what is a truly exceptional, long-lost work. The Bust of Peace is one of a small series of works that Canova made late in life for his closest friends and patrons and so, as you might expect, each marble is executed with a befittingly high degree of care and attention. The sculptor’s ability to breathe life into cold marble is unrivalled in Neoclassical sculpture. This one is a technical tour de force, displaying Canova's absolute mastery in marble, particularly with the beautiful carving of the hair and the purity of the expression. Autograph works by Canova are fantastically rare on the market, and so to be offering this bust, newly-rediscovered and with such a special story behind it, is something remarkable indeed."

The Museo del Prado presents 'The Triumph of Death' by Pieter Bruegel the Elder following its recent restoration

$
0
0

The Triumph of Death

Pieter Bruegel the Elder (1562 - 1563), The Triumph of Death, oil on panel, 117 x 162 cm. Photo © Museo Nacional del Prado.

MADRID.- The Museo del Prado today presented The Triumph of Death by Pieter Bruegel the Elder following its restoration; one of the most important of its kind undertaken last year within the programme sponsored by Fundación Iberdrola España. Formerly in the Spanish Royal Collection, this was the only work by Bruegel in Spain until 2011 when the Museum acquired The Wine of Saint Martin’s Day. The Triumph of Death is a moralising work that shows the triumph of Death over worldly things, a recurring theme in medieval literature for which Bruegel was influenced by Jheronimus Bosch. 

The restoration of this exceptional painting, undertaken by María Antonia López de Asiain (pictorial surface) and José de la Fuente (support), has reinstated its structural stability and its original colours, composition and unique pictorial technique based on precise brushstrokes which achieve transparency in the background areas and remarkable crispness in the foreground planes. 

Restoration process 
The support
 
At an unknown date the four horizontal oak panels on which Bruegel’s work is painted were planed to reduce their thickness. At this same moment they were reinforced with a cradle that prevented any natural movement of the wood. 

At the time the support was reduced to its present thickness (between 6 and 8 mm), the four panels of which it is made up were separated then reassembled. During the latter process the internal edges of the panels were sanded which removed part of the paint, visible above all in the diagonal elements and figures on the pictorial surface. The join between the panels was not well levelled-off and in order to disguise this the adjoining areas were covered with gesso and repainting which concealed part of the original. Furthermore, when the panels were separated the upper one was damaged, resulting in various cracks running from one end to another. 

Given the state of conservation of the support, the present restoration has removed the cradle in order to free up the natural movement of the wood. In addition, the cracks and the panels have been realigned to form a level surface, involving the separation of the top panel in order to ensure that it lies flat. 

Having restored the cracks and joins a secondary support (a beech wood stretcher) was made to the exact curvature which the panel assumed once the cradle had been removed. This was done to ensure stability, respecting its hygroscopic movements. 

The stretcher was joined to the painting using a system of flat, stainless steel springs that were adhered to the support using brass buttons in a reversible manner. These springs are inserted into nylon screws that allow for any movement in 360º of traction, dilation and contraction within the plane.

The pictorial surface 
The painting, which was carefully prepared down to the smallest detail through a preparatory cartoon, was hidden under a large amount of re-painting from different earlier restorations which were in turn subsequently masked by coloured varnishes to produce a uniform effect, completely transforming the painting’s appearance to an ochre, almost monochrome one. 

The work has required a complete cleaning. This has been a complex undertaking due to the subtlety of the thin layer of original pigment in contrast to the thickness and hardness of the areas of repainting. Removing the overall repainting has succeeded in removing the warm toned veil added in earlier restorations, thus revealing previously concealed details of the original painting. The overall tonality has changed and it is now possible to appreciate its crisp blue and red tones. Finally, the complexity of the composition and depth of the landscape have been re-established. 

Infra-red reflectography and a study of the copies made by Bruegel’s sons based on the same cartoon have made it possible to correctly reintegrate small lost elements that were simply invented with incorrect reconstructions during earlier restorations.

1

The Triumph of Death by Pieter Bruegel the Elder in room 55A , after its restoration. Photo © Museo Nacional del Prado.

A rare archaic jade dragon, Late Shang Dynasty

$
0
0

A rare archaic jade dragon, Late Shang Dynasty

0

Lot 1. A rare archaic jade dragon, Late Shang Dynasty; 3.6cm (1 1/2in) wide. Estimate 50,000-80,000 HKD. Sold for HK$ 1,025,000 (€ 112,200) inc. premium© Bonhams 2001-2018

Carved in the form of a circular coiled dragon with its tail curving towards the head, the horns and eyes subtly carved in relief, the body incised with double-line scrolls, the top with a pierced hole, the stone of a buff tone with traces of cinnabar. 

NoteCompare with a similar jade dragon, Shang dynasty, similarly carved with protruding eyes and double-line scrolls, illustrated in Compendium of Collection in the Palace Museum: Jade 2 Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties, Beijing, 2011, pl.122.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

A rare carved cinnabar lacquer 'peony' dish, Second half 14th century

$
0
0

A rare carved cinnabar lacquer 'peony' dish, Second half 14th century

Lot 8. A rare carved cinnabar lacquer 'peony' dish, Second half 14th century; 18cm (7 1/8in) diam. (3). Estimate 750,000 - 1,000,000 HKD. Sold for HK$ 937,500 (€ 102,622) inc. premium. © Bonhams 2001-2018

With shallow rounded sides resting on a short foot, the interior exquisitely carved in deep relief through the thick red lacquer with three large peony blossoms, the large furled petals enclosing the meticulously carved floral-diapered stamens, all amidst dense foliage of large leaves and further blossoms and buds, the exterior carved with C-scrolls, the base lacquered black, Japanese box and cover

NoteThe present dish encapsulates the mature style of late Yuan to early Ming dynasty lacquer carving, characterised by deep high-relief carving and the overlapping of elements within the composition to allow for a greater sense of depth. A second half 14th century date is further demonstrated in the deeply carved continuous scroll around the exterior and the edged linear rim.

The main composition of three fully blossoming leafy peonies continued onto the early 15th century, as demonstrated in similarly decorated Yongle and Xuande carved lacquer wares; see a number of carved lacquer boxes and covers, Yongle and Xuande marks and period, illustrated in Carving the Subtle Radiance of Colors: Treasures Lacquerware in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, 2008, nos.8-12. Compare also a similar carved lacquer dish, Yuan dynasty, but carved with a single peony blossom, from the Qing Court Collection, illustrated in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum: Lacquer Wares of the Yuan and Ming Dynasties, Hong Kong, 2006, no.3. See also a similar carved lacquer dish, Yuan dynasty, signed Chang Mao, from the Sir Percival David Collection, exhibited in the Royal Academy of Arts, International Exhibition of Chinese Art, London, 1935-1936, no.1027.

0

A carved lacquer dish, Yuan dynasty from the Qing Court Collection. Image courtesy of the Palace Museum, Beijing.

See a related but small carved lacquer dish, Yuan dynasty, decorated with a single peony blossom, which was sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 28 November 2012, lot 2083; and see another carved cinnabar lacquer dish, early Ming dynasty, which was sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 30 May 2006, lot 1527.

A rare small carved cinnabar lacquer 'peony' dish, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368) 

A rare small carved cinnabar lacquer 'peony' dish, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368), from the Edward T. Chow Collection & the Lee Family Collection; 6 in. (15.3 cm.) diam. Sold for 740,000 HKD (Estimate HKD 600,000 - HKD 800,000) at Christie's Hong Kong, 28 November 2012, lot 2083. © Christie's Images Ltd 2012

The circular dish is finely carved through thick layers of cinnabar lacquer with a large peony blossom in the centre surrounded by smaller peonies and leaves, all against a yellow ground. The reverse side is deeply carved with xiangcao scrolls. The base is lacquered black and incised with a Zhang Cheng mark.

Provenance: Edward T. Chow Collection
Sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 3rd and 4th May 1994, lot 276

Property from the Lee Family Collection.

Exhibited: Baur Collection Galleries, Exhibition of One Man's Taste, Treasures from the Lakeside Pavillion, Geneva, 1988-1989, illsutrated in the Catalogue, no. L2

Note: The Yuan Mongol regime was proactive in promoting commerce and trade throughout its empire and was particularly supportive of various local artistries. It is against this background that we witness a rapid development of lacquer art during the Yuan period both in terms of quality and stylistic evolution. The current dish attests to the much bolder and freer rendering of motifs typical of Yuan lacquer wares, with the dramatic presence of a large peony surrounded by overlapping elements. Such free spirit in the carving is rarely seen in later Ming dynasty imperial wares, where decorations became much more formalised .

The current dish is very similar to a Yuan period cinnabar lacquer dish with the signature of the fabled Yuan lacquer master Zhang Cheng, similarly carved but with a prominent gardenia in the centre amidst dense overlapping leaves and buds, in the collection of the Palace Museum, Beijing and illustrated in Lacquer Wares of the Yuan and Ming Dynasties, The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, Hong Kong, 2006, pl. 3. The same publication mentions that the classic scrolls on the exterior of the dish, like the current example, are typical of those found on Yuan lacquer dishes, ibid, p. 10. Compare also another larger cinnabar lacquer dish with carved peonies formerly in the Lee Family Collection, sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 1 December 2009, lot 1813. 

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY


A fine and large bronze figure of a Daoist immortal, 16th-17th century

$
0
0

0

2

1

Lot 9. A fine and large bronze figure of a Daoist immortal, 16th-17th century; 59cm (23 1/4in) high. Estimate 400,000-600,000 HKD. Sold for HK$ 625,000 (€ 68,415) inc. premium. © Bonhams 2001-2018

The sage heavily cast seated as a dignitary wearing an elaborately decorated cap of office with long flowing ribbons, his beard hanging down his chest embellished with a rectangular-shaped clasp holding the robe, his hands swathed in the long pleated robe resting on his laps, the figure with traces of gilt-lacquer, the wood stand carved as a throne. 

ProvenanceSotheby's New York, 28 February 1980, lot 5
An American private collection, Virginia.

NoteThe Daoist Immortal figure with his hands swathed under the robe may represent Tianguan, the Heaven Office, one of the Three High Officials of Daoism and sometimes identified as the 'Star' God of Happiness. Daoism flourished in the Ming dynasty under Imperial patronage, especially under the Jiajing and Wanli emperors who were fervent supporters of Daoist practices. 

Relatively small number of bronze figures are known to have survived of this large size and impressive weight. Compare a large bronze figure of Mingzhen dadi, Ming dynasty, currently in the Ancient Bronze Shrine on the Wudang Mountains, illustrated by Zhang Jiyu, The Great Series of Daoist Immortal Statues, Beijing, 2012, p.361; compare another similarly attired gilt-bronze figure of Tianguan, 16th century, which was sold at Christie's New York, 20 March 2014, lot 1627; and a large gilt-lacquered bronze figure of a Daoist immortal, 17th century, which was sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 30 November 2017, lot 442.

3

An impressive large gilt-bronze figure of a Daoist deity, China, Ming dynasty, 16th century; 29½ in. (75 cm.) high. Sold for 845,000 USD (Estimate 800,000 - USD 1,000,000) at Christie's New York, 20 March 2014, lot 1627© Christie's Images Ltd 2014

The figure, with benevolent expression, is finely cast in a seated position with hands clasped together in front of the chest, and wearing a voluminous robe that falls to the top of his ruyi-toed shoes and is secured with a court belt and a long sash tied in a bow between the legs. The borders are variously engraved with dragons chasing flaming pearls, floral scroll and zabao (miscellaneous treasures). The deity also wears a ribbed headdress secured by a hairpin and hung with cords that trail behind the ears and are then crossed above a lock-form pendant, stand.

NoteThis imposing figure, with his handsome and benevolent features, most likely represents Tianguan, the Heaven Official, one of the Three High Officials of Daoism. His role is to give people their alloted share of luck and happiness, and he is also sometimes identified with Fuxing, the "star" god of Happiness.

The type of ribbed court hat ("curling cloud crown"), robe, ruyi-toed shoes and the lock pendant worn by this figure appear to be based on the emperor's court dress during the Song dynasty, which is represented by reconstructions based on historical documents and "Portraits of monarchs of Various Dynasties" exhibited at Nanxu Palace, illustrated by Zhou Xun and Gao Chunming in 5000 Years of Chinese Costumes, Hong Kong, 1984, pp. 108-9, figs. 185, 186, and 188. Also illustrated, p. 109, fig. 189, is a painting of the Emperor Song Xuanzu wearing this type of court dress.

This court dress continued into the Ming dynasty, and is the type worn not only by the present figure but also related Daoist deities depicted in paintings of early Ming date. See, for example, the seven star-gods of the Central Dipper depicted in a painting entitled, Lords of the Root Destiny Stars of the Northern and Central Dippers, dated Jingtai reign, 1454, published by Stephen Little in Daoism and the Arts of China, The Art Institute of Chicago, 2000, p. 248, no. 78. The author notes that the hats worn by these deities distinguished their places in the celestial hierarchy. 

The same hats are also worn by two Daoist deities in a painting, Gods of the Twenty-eight Lunar Mansions, also dated to 1454, in the Museé National des Arts Asiatiques Guimet, Paris, illustrated ibid., p. 249, no. 79. The court hats worn by the Daoist deities in the two paintings are tied under the chin with cords, while on the present figure these cords fall behind the ears and are crossed together neatly above the rectangular lock pendant. This variation is perhaps an attempt to render the task of casting easier when transforming such figures into the sculptural form. This same depiction of the cords is seen on a large, similarly attired, stone figure of an official standing along the spirit road to a Ming-dynasty imperial tomb in the Changping District, Beijing, illustrated in Zhongguo Meishu Quanji; Yuan Ming Qing diaosu, vol. 6, Beijing, 1988, p. 118, no. 128. 

4

5

6

A large gilt-lacquered bronze figure of a Daoist immortal, 17th century; 84 cm, 33 1/8  in. Sold for 875,000 HKD (Estimate 200,000 — 300,000 HKD) at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 30 November 2017, lot 442. Courtesy Sotheby's.

possible depicting Wenchang Wang, cast seated on a chamfered pedestal with the hands folded before the chest, wearing loose robes engraved with dragons, the shoulders similarly decorated with roundels enclosing the sun and the moon respectively, the bearded face with a benevolent expression flanked by long pendulous ears, crowned by a tall official hat decorated with mountain and waves.

Provenance: Christie's London, 15th June 1998, lot 107.: Christie's London, 15th June 1998, lot 107.

Note: Finely cast as a Daoist immortal wearing long robes sumptuously decorated with Daoist symbols, this figure is notable for its impressive size which together with the traces of gilt lacquer, hint at its original splendour. While its identification can only be speculated, the figure’s court attire, rectangular pendant around the neck and tall court hat are indicative of his elevated position in the Daoist pantheon. It may depict Wenchang Wang, also known as Wenchang dijun, the Daoist god of Culture and Literature, who is often depicted holding a ruyi-sceptre or a tablet.

The robe, ruyi-toed shoes, dragon design and lock pendant may be linked to a particular style of court dress that evolved from the Song dynasty through the Ming period, and was also worn by high-ranking figures in the Daoist pantheon.

Daoism flourished in the Ming dynasty under the Jiajing and Wanli Emperors, who were fervent supporters of Daoist practices promising the attainment of immortality. During the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, numerous bronze figures of Daoist deities were cast under imperial patronage or commissioned by wealthy families.

A closely related figure was sold in our London rooms, 24th July 1973, lot 154; and one wearing a slightly different hat and holding a tablet, was sold in these rooms, 8th October 2006, lot 1158. See also a smaller example sold in our New York rooms, 28th February 1980, lot 5; one sold in our London rooms, 30th October 1987, lot 416; another sold at Christie’s London, 12th June 1989, lot 96; and one inscribed with a cyclical date corresponding to 1567, sold in our London rooms, 16th November 1971, lot 23.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

A fine gilt-bronze figure of Vajrabhairava and Vajravetali, Qing Dynasty, 18th century

$
0
0

0

1

2

3

Lot 13. A fine gilt-bronze figure of Vajrabhairava and Vajravetali, Qing Dynasty, 18th century; 23cm (9in) high. Estimate 1,000,000-1,500,000 HKD. Sold for HK$ 1,250,000 (€ 136,830) inc. premium. © Bonhams 2001-2018

The yidam and consort striding in alidhasana trampling a menagerie of animals including geese and bulls raised on prone figures of deities on a separate beaded lotus throne, the central ferocious buffalo face surrounded by six human faces and two above, the primary hands wrapped around his consort holding a chopper and a skull cup, the other thirty-two radiating arms holding various implements, adorned with elaborate beaded jewellery and a garland of severed heads, box. 

ProvenanceMr R.P. Collection, France, acquired in China and Tibet between 1910 and 1925, by repute.

Note: The powerfully cast figure of Vajrabhairava with his consort Vajravetali is a very fine example of Buddhist sculptures commissioned under the fertile cross-influence between the Imperial Court and Tibetan monastic seats of power during the Qing dynasty. 

Yamantaka Vajrabhairava is a wrathful form of Manjushri, the Bodhisattva of Discriminating Wisdom, and is a destroyer of ignorance and fear of death. He is one of the principal meditation deities in the Gelug Tradition of Tibetan Buddhism founded by Tsongkhapa (1357-1419). The Gelug lineage became the dominant religious power in Tibet during the 17th century and was later favoured by the Qing Court.

Tsongkhapa and the Qing emperors also promoted themselves as manifestations of the bodhisattva Manjushri, thus contributing to the proliferation of images of Vajrabhairava within China. During the 18th century, the Qianlong emperor further maintained direct links with the Dalai and Panchen Lamas for both religious and political considerations, underlined by the construction of a large number of temples in and around Beijing. Images of Vajrabhairava, therefore, carried both religious and Imperial connotations, endorsing the Mandate of Heaven of the emperor.

This impressive and heavily-cast figure of Vajrabhairava is skilfully constructed in several pieces and fitted together. Compare a similar figure illustrated by Hung Shih Chang and Jessica P.P. Hsu, eds., Buddhist Art from Rehol: Tibetan Buddhist Images and Ritual Objects from the Qing Dynasty Summer Palace at Chengde, Taipei, 1999, p.122, pl.46.

Compare the modelling, construction and style of the present figure with two slightly smaller examples of Vajrabhairava in ecstatic union, 18th century; the first which was sold at Christie's New York, 15th-16th March 2015, lot 3214, and the second which was sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 3 April 2018, lot 3679.

4

A gilt-bronze figure of Vajrabhairava and Vajra Vetali, Qianlong period (1736-1795); 13 ½ in. (34.3 cm.) high. Sold for 545,000 USD (Estimate USD 200,000 - USD 300,000) at Christie's New York, 15th-16th March 2015, lot 3214© Christie's Images Ltd 2015

The wrathful, meditational deity is shown striding in alidhasana on animals and prostrate figures on a lotus base. In his primary hands he holds a curved knife and skull cup and in the multitude of other outstretched hands he holds various implements. The central face is in the form of a ferocious buffalo, with bulging eyes and flaming brows, and is flanked and surmounted by additional human faces. His consort, Vetali, stands before him with her left leg wrapped around his waist, holding a skull cup and curved knife.

Provenance: Important private collection, France, acquired 1960-1990.

Note: The present figure represents the ferocious, thirty-four-armed form of the deity Vajrabhairava, a manifestation of the bodhisattva Manjushri, with his consort, Vajra Vetali. Vajrabhairava is one of the principle meditational deities in the Gelug sect of Tibetan Buddhism, which from the 17th century was the dominant religious power in Tibet. The Qing emperors maintained direct links with the dignitaries of the Gelug sect, including the Dalai and Panchen Lamas, and propagated this form of Buddhism within China itself, sponsoring the lavish construction of numerous temples in and around the capital of Beijing. In the 18th century, the Qianlong Emperor promoted himself as a manifestation of Manjushri as well, underlining his wisdom, compassion, and spiritual transcendence. Images of Vajrabhairava, therefore, carried both a religious and political weight, fulfilling their role within Gelug worship and practice, while simultaneously promoting the lineage of the Emperor.

This impressive and heavily-cast figure is cleverly constructed in several pieces, including, unusually, the upper half of the goddess' body, which attaches to the lower half and the main figure with a tang and socket. The deity strides on the backs of Hindu gods, identified by Jeff Watt as Brahma, Indra, Vishnu, Shiva, Kartikkeya, Ganesha, Surya, and Chandra. Each deity, as well as each aspect of Vajrabhairava's appearance, acts as a mnemonic device for remembering the meditational worship of the god.

5

A gilt-bronze figure of Yamantaka and Vajra Vetali, Qing dynasty, 18th century; 20 cm, 7 7/8  in. Sold for 1,187,500 HKD (Estimate 600,000 — 800,000 HKD) at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 3 April 2018, lot 3679. Courtesy Sotheby's.

cast in the form of the yidam and consort standing in alidhasana on trampled figures, birds and bovine animals, all atop a lotus base with a beaded upper edge, the buffalo-headed yidam portrayed ferocious with bulging eyes and a gaping mouth, surmounted by flaming hair, with thirty-two outstretched arms and a pair wrapped around the consort, holding in some of his hands implements and ritual weapons, further depicted adorned with a garland of severed skulls, the consort rendered in ecstatic union with the yidam and holding a kapala filled with amrita in the raised left hand and a kartrika in the right.

Note: The complex and powerfully modelled sculpture depicts Yamantaka Vajrabhairava, the wrathful manifestation of Manjushri, the Bodhisattva of Discriminating Wisdom, together with his consort Vajravetali in ecstatic union. The large and ferocious buffalo head of Vajrabhairava with towering, fiery tresses coiled into thick ropes dominate the sculpture and commands the focal point, as it is the same size as the torso and legs. Six fierce human faces wrap around the back of the buffalo head, and are surmounted by a further fierce human face and the head of wrathful Manjushri.  

Vajrabhairava, or Adamantine Anger, the destroyer of ignorance and fear of death, is one of the principal yidams of the Geluk sect, the Tibetan Buddhist order founded by Tsongkhapa (1357-1419) that was later favoured at the Qing court. The Geluk sect enjoyed increased importance amongst the emperors of the Ming dynasty. From the mid-17th century on, The Geluk lineage were the dominant theocratic power in Tibet through the Dalai Lama, and the sole represented Tibetan Buddhist lineage within China.

Tsongkhapa, as well as the Manchu emperors, were additionally considered manifestations of the bodhisattva Manjushri, explaining in part the popularity of Vajrabhairava within China. The Qing emperors maintained direct links with the Dalai and Panchen Lamas and propagated the Geluk lineage of Buddhism within China, sponsoring the construction of numerous monasteries and temples around the capital of Beijing. Vajrabhairava, the all-powerful manifestation of Manjushri, was thereby symbolic of the ultimate imperial authority. This awe-inspiring statue serves to enforce the imperial mandate while representing the highest ideals of the spiritual path to Buddhist enlightenment.

Another figure of similar size, iconography and workmanship is illustrated by Hung Shih Chang and Jessica P.P. Hsu, eds. Buddhist Art from Rehol: Tibetan Buddhist images and ritual objects from the Qing dynasty Summer Palace at Chengde, Taipei, 1999, p. 122, pl. 46. See also a closely related gilt-bronze figure of Yamantaka and Vajravetali, sold at Christie's New York, 15th-16th March 2015, lot 3214.

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

A very rare and fine Imperial copper-red vase, meiping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

$
0
0

A very rare and fine Imperial copper-red vase, meiping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795)

1

0

Lot 49. A very rare and fine Imperial copper-red vase, meiping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period (1736-1795); 23cm (9in) high. Estimate 1,000,000-1,500,000 HKDSold for HK$ 2,000,000 (€ 218,928) inc. premium© Bonhams 2001-2018

Rising from a slightly flared foot to high rounded shoulders, surmounted by a waisted neck and rounded mouth rim, covered overall with a lustrous crushed raspberry-red glaze, pooling neatly above the foot ring and base of the neck.

ProvenanceFrancis Capel Harrison (1863-1938), King's Lynn, Norfolk, acquired 1900-1903
Bluett & Sons Ltd., London
Baron Alexander von Meyendorff (1869-1964), London, acquired from the above on 15 June 1925
A distinguished European private collection, and thence by descent.

ExhibitedThe Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, December 1903.

PublishedBluett & Sons Ltd., A Collection of Old Chinese Monochrome Porcelain, London, June 1925, no.7, and according to which the vase was 'from the Imperial Palace, Peking'

NoteFrancis Capel Harrison served as a long standing civil servant in India (1884-1911), and in his later years was appointed Head Commissioner of Paper Currency before returning to London where he became a Member of Parliament and a correspondent for the Economic Journal. Much of his collection, including the present vase, was exhibited in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford since 1903 and for about twenty years, prior to 130 pieces being sold with Bluett's in 1925. He acquired objects from Sparks as well as Bluett's. See R.David and D.Jellinek, Provenance, Collectors, Dealers and Scholars in the Field of Chinese Ceramics in Britain and America, 2011, p.223.

2

Baron Alexander von Meyendorff (1869-1964) was the son of the Russian diplomat Felix Meyendorff and Olga, Princess Gorchakov. After a military career and then a short political career reaching the position of the Deputy Parliamentary President of the Duma, following the Russian Revolution in February 1917, he was appointed as the Ambassador of the Provisional Russian Government to Great Britain in London. During the turmoil of the October Revolution he managed to flee to London, arriving there in 1919, where he was Reader in Russian Institutions and Economics at the London School of Economics, 1922-1934. 

The rich red glaze characterising the present meiping exemplifies the technical accomplishments achieved in producing glazes of remarkable brilliance, colours and texture, during the reign of the Qianlong emperor. 

Copper-red glazed vessels were revived during the reign of the Kangxi emperor in an effort to reproduce the classic sacrificial-red, or jihong porcelain wares of the Ming dynasty, notably the specimens dating to the Hongwu and Xuande reigns. Recording the production of copper-red-glaze at Jingdezhen during the Kangxi reign, French Jesuit Pere Francois D'Entrecolles (1664-1741) acknowledged the difficulties involved in making the highly sought-after glaze and the refined skills of the potters. Copper-red glazes vessels featuring a skilfully controlled application of the glaze continued to be manufactured during the reigns of the Yongzheng and Qianlong emperors, with the former taking an active interest in ensuring the production of red-glazed vessels characterised by the right glaze thinness and texture.  

For a similar copper-red-glazed vase, meiping, Qianlong seal mark and of the period, see The Tsui Museum of Art: Chinese Ceramics Vol.IV Qing Dynasty, Hong Kong, 1995, no.39, which was later sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 5 November 1997, lot 864; and see also another example in the Roemer Museum, Hildesheim, illustrated by U.Wiesner, Chinesisches Porzellan, Mainz am Rhein, Hildesheim, 1981, pl.99. 

A similar copper-red-glazed meiping, Qianlong mark and of the period, was sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 10th April 2006, lot 1521. For a similar copper-red meiping but from the Yongzheng period, see one sold at Christie's Hong Kong, 1 June 2011, lot 3614. 

Bonhams. FINE CHINESE CERAMICS AND WORKS OF ART, 29 May 2018, 14:00 HKT, HONG KONG, ADMIRALTY

A sancai ingot-shaped pillow and a Qingbai ewer, Song dynasty (960-1279)

$
0
0

A sancai ingot-shaped pillow and a Qingbai ewer, Song dynasty (960-1279)

Lot 378. A sancai ingot-shaped pillow and a Qingbai ewer, Song dynasty (960-1279); pillow: 18 cm, 7 1/8  in.; ewer: h. 11.1 cm, 4 3/8  in. Estimate 20,000 - 30,000 HKD. Courtesy Sotheby's.

the pillow decorated with floral scrolls and geometric patterns in amber, green and cream glaze; the ewer with an eight-lobed body, covered overall in a blue-tinged translucent glaze.

Sotheby's. Chinese Art, Hong Kong, 31 may 2018, 11:15 AM

A Qingbai pillow, Song dynasty (960-1279)

$
0
0

A Qingbai pillow, Song dynasty (960-1279)

Lot 381. A Qingbai pillow, Song dynasty (960-1279); 16.9 cm, 6 5/8  in. Estimate 30,000 - 50,000 HKD. Courtesy Sotheby's.

one face carved with a Buddhist lion grasping in its mouth a flower spray, the reverse with a recumbent ram among jagged rock, the sides decorated with a floral scroll, applied overall with a transparent blue-tinged glaze.

Provenance: Littleton and Hennessy Asian Art, London.

Sotheby's. Chinese Art, Hong Kong, 31 may 2018, 11:15 AM

A rare Qingbai stem cup, Song dynasty (960-1279)

$
0
0

A rare Qingbai stem cup, Song dynasty (960-1279)

Lot 385. A rare Qingbai stem cup, Song dynasty (960-1279); 13.3 cm, 5 1/4  in. Estimate 40,000 - 60,000 HKD. Courtesy Sotheby's.

the deep rounded sides rising from a stepped pedestal arranged in three tiers of petal-fluted collars to a flat everted rim, covered overall in a white translucent glaze.

Note: Compare similar pieces included in Illustrated Catalogues of Tokyo National MuseumChinese Ceramics I, Tokyo, 1965, pls 393 and 394.

Sotheby's. Chinese Art, Hong Kong, 31 may 2018, 11:15 AM

A Dingyao cup stand, Song dynasty (960-1279)

$
0
0

A Dingyao cup stand, Song dynasty (960-1279)

Lot 387. A Dingyao cup stand, Song dynasty (960-1279); 16.4 cm, 6 1/2  in. Estimate 20,000 - 63,000 HKD. Courtesy Sotheby's.

covered overall save for the foot ring in a creamy-white transparent glaze, with typical teardrops showing on the underside.

ProvenanceBluett & Sons Ltd, London, by repute (label)..

Sotheby's. Chinese Art, Hong Kong, 31 may 2018, 11:15 AM


An extremely rare doucai and famille rose ‘anbaxian’ vase, tianqiuping. Qianlong six-character seal mark and of the period

$
0
0

A fine magnificent and extremely rare doucai and famille rose ‘anbaxian’ vase, tianqiuping, Qianlong six-character seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795)

1

 

4

9

10

 

 

11

2

 

 

5

 

6

 

7

3

Lot 8888. A fine magnificent and extremely rare doucai and famille rose ‘anbaxian’ vase, tianqiuping, Qianlong six-character seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795);  21 1/4 in. (53.9 cm.) high. Estimate: HK$70,000,000–90,000,000Price realised HK$ 130,600,000. © Christie's Images Ltd 2018

The magnificent vase is superbly potted with a globular body surmounted by a columnar neck, delicately enamelled in the doucai and famille rose palettes, on the body with theanbaxian, ‘Eight Daoist Emblems’, each tied with flowing ribbons, amid leafy scroll issuing lotus blossoms in two rows, all between lappets at the foot and a band of cloud-shaped collar at the shoulder. The neck is enamelled with four lotus blossoms, beneath pendent double-fish and musical chimes.

Provenane: George Hathaway Taber (1859-1940) Collection, prior to 1925, and thence by descent within the family
Mrs. Francis Keally (nee Mildred Taber, 1891-1975) Collection
Philbrook Museum of Art, Tulsa, Oklahoma, gift of Mrs. Francis Keally,
accessioned in 1960.

NoteThe current vase is a magnificent example of imperial Qianlong porcelain. The name of this shape of vase in Chinese is tianqiuping‘heavenly globe vase’, and it is significant that in Chinese iconography the earth is represented by a square, while heaven is represented by a circle. Hence, the large globular body of such vases provides an ideal reference to heaven. This vase is a particularly large and impressive specimen of the tianqiuping shape. The vessel is extremely well-potted and the generous globe of the body has retained its form even after firing, while some other examples can be seen to have sunk slightly under their own weight. The neck is in ideal proportion to the body, and has also remained in perfect alignment. The fact that this large vessel has fired so perfectly is a testament to the great skill of the potter, who has not only thrown it absolutely evenly – so that it did not distort in the kiln – but has perfectly judged the thickness of clay and precise junction of the neck to prevent the latter from sinking into the body during firing.

Although the tianqiuping shape appears in Chinese porcelains as early as the 15th century of the Ming dynasty in China, the 15th century examples have a shorter neck in proportion to the body than the 18th century vases. This can be seen on the early 15th century blue and white tianqiuping in the collection of the Palace Museum Beijing, illustrated in Blue and White Porcelain with Underglaze Red (I), The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, vol. 34, Hong Kong, 2000, pp. 90-95, nos. 87-89 (fig. 1). The tianqiuping shape really came to prominence in the 18th century on imperial porcelains commissioned by emperors who were unconcerned by the cost of producing such extravagant vessels. A number of tianqiuping were made in the Yongzheng reign (1723-35) – primarily with underglaze blue or overglaze famille rose decoration. An example of the latter, decorated with blossoming chrysanthemums, and somewhat smaller than the current vase, is in the collection of the Tokyo National Museum (illustrated in Oriental Ceramics, The World’s Great Collections, vol. 1, Tokyo, 1976, col. pl. 80. (fig. 2)). Two Yongzheng tianqiuping of similar size to the current vase, but decorated in underglaze blue, from the Qing court collection of Palace Museum, Beijing, are illustrated in Blue and White Porcelain with Underglaze Red (III), The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, vol. 36, Hong Kong, 2000, pp. 96-7, nos. 82 and 83.

It is very rare to find a vase of this massive size with doucai decoration. This was a difficult and expensive decorative technique. First, the fine underglaze cobalt blue outlines were painted onto the porous unfired body. As the cobalt immediately soaked into the unfired clay, no mistakes could be rectified. The vessel was then glazed and fired. After the glazed piece had cooled, the overglaze enamels were carefully applied inside the underglaze blue outlines and the piece was fired again at a lower temperature. As each firing would have resulted in some failures, and large vessels tended to be more susceptible to warping and splitting, it would have been an expensive undertaking to create large doucai vessels which met imperial high standards. It is telling that even the Palace Museum in Beijing appears to have published only one Qianlong doucai vase (decorated with tribute bearers) which is as tall as the current vase(illustrated in Porcelains in Polychrome and Contrasting Colours, The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, vol. 38, Hong Kong, 1999, p. 274, no. 251)(fig. 3). Even the famous Qianlong doucai dragon moon flask in the Palace Museum (illustrated by E.S. Rawski and J. Rawson (eds.) in China  The Three Emperors 1662-1795, London, 2005, pp. 294-5, no. 217) is 6 cms. smaller than the current vase, while the large Qianlong doucai charger, decorated with the Eight Buddhist Emblems, from the imperial collection in the Nanjing Museum (illustrated in Qing Imperial Porcelain of the Kangxi, Yongzheng and Qianlong Reigns, Nanjing, 1995, no. 104) is 5 cm. smaller. The famous Qianlong doucai flask with a design of a farmer ploughing his fields (inspired by the 1696 Yuzhi Gengzhi tu, Imperially commissioned Pictures of Tilling and Weaving) in the collection of the Tianjin Museum of Art (illustrated in Zhongguo wenwu jinghua daquan  Taoci juan, Taipei, 1993, p. 442, no. 936) is of comparable size to the current vase.

A Qianlong tianqiuping with doucai decoration, but of smaller size (H: 42 cm.) is in the collection of the Matsuoka Museum of Art in Japan (illustrated in Masterpieces of Oriental Ceramics from Matsuoka Museum of Art, Japan, 1997, p. 43, no. 33). A Qianlong imperial tianqiuping decorated in underglaze red and blue with some celadon areas, and another decorated in underglaze blue, and a further Qianlong tianqiuping with monochrome blue glaze, of slightly larger size to the current vase, are in the collection of the Nanjing Museum (illustrated in in Qing Imperial Porcelain of the Kangxi, Yongxzheng and Qianlong Reigns, Nanjing, 1995, nos. 80, 77 and 66, respectively). 

It seems likely that the current vase was made at the imperial kilns early in the Qianlong reign. There are several aspects of the decoration that suggest this dating. Perhaps most telling is the delicacy and use of colour seen in the doucai decoration, which is akin to that of the Yongzheng reign. The underglaze blue outlines are both paler and narrower than those found on the majority of Qianlong doucai vessels, while the blue washes are softer in appearance. The overglaze enamel colours are also applied with considerable restraint – highlighting certain aspects of the design without producing an overall gaudiness. The use of colours on the current vase may perhaps be compared with that of the Yongzheng doucai meiping in the collection of the Palace Museum, Beijing, which is illustrated in Porcelains in Polychrome and Contrasting Colours, The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, vol. 38, Hong Kong, 1999, p. 245, no. 225. (fig. 4) There are also small details, such as the style of the petal band which encircles the foot of the current vase. This is relatively rare in the Qianlong reign, but can be found more often on Yongzheng porcelains, such as the enamelled bowl illustrated in Porcelains inPolychrome and Contrasting Coloursop. cit., p. 171, no. 157. 

An early Qianlong date is also suggested by the seal-script reign mark in underglaze blue on the base of the vase. Professor Peter Lam has conducted detailed research into the form of reign marks during the Qianlong reign, and the reign mark on the current vase accords most closely with the style that he denotes ‘type 5’. (see Peter Y.K. Lam, ‘Towards a Dating Framework for Qianlong Imperial Porcelain’, Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society, vol. 74, 2009-2010, p. 23). Interestingly, Lam describes this mark as ‘...similar to the standard squarish seal mark of Yongzheng ..., but the brushstrokes are more angular’. Lam estimates that this style of seal mark was in use from approximately the 7th to the 35th year of the Qianlong Emperor’s 60-year reign. This would mean that the current vase was made during the tenure of the most revered of all the supervisors of the Qing Imperial kilns, Tang Ying (1682- 1756), under whose auspices some of the finest imperial porcelains were made. 

In addition, an early Qianlong date is suggested by a note in the palace records which states that on the twenty-fifth day of sixth month of Qianlong third year (1738): [a model of] a large wucai tianqiu zun decorated with the Eight Daoist Emblems was presented ...[The Emperor decreed] Manufacture accordingly, and return the original porcelain model to the porcelain storeroom when it is done. Although the vessel mentioned in the records is described as wucai, rather than doucai, it may nevertheless refer to the same type of vessel as the current vase, and at the very least indicates that the Qianlong Emperor commissioned the Eight Daoist Emblems to be applied to tianqiuping at this early date. 

Although the vessel mentioned in the records is described as wucai, rather than doucai, it may nevertheless refer to the same type of vessel as the current vase, and at the very least indicates that the Qianlong Emperor commissioned the Eight Daoist Emblems to be applied to tianqiuping at this early date. 

The choice of decorative motifs on the current vase are rare on Qianlong doucai porcelains. The body of the vase is decorated with a delicate lotus scroll with multicoloured blossoms and punctuated with the Eight Daoist Emblems tied alternately with red and blue ribbons. The Eight Daoist Emblems are the attributes of the Eight Daoist Immortals. The fan belongs to Han Zhongli, the gourd (which contains magic potions) and iron crutch belongs to Li Tieguai, the bamboo drum and metal drum sticks belong to Zhang Guolao, a lotus or bamboo sieve belong to He Xiangu - the only female member of the group, who is regarded as the patron saint of housewives, a basket of flowers or peaches belong to Lan Caihe, the sword and fly whisk belong to Lu Dongbin, the pair of castanets belong Cao Guojiu, and the flute belongs to Han Xiangzi. While these attributes were seen accompanying the Eight Immortals from the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368), it was only in the Qing dynasty that the attributes alone became a popular motif, imbued with the same auspicious wishes as the immortals to whom they belonged. It seems that the Daoist Emblems’ first appearance alone on porcelains was in the Yongzheng reign. While the Qianlong Emperor, like his father and grandfather, was a devout Buddhist, the inclusion of Daoist symbols on an imperial vase would have been entirely appropriate in view of their auspicious message.On the neck suspended, beribboned, qing chiming stones alternate with suspended, beribboned, twin fish, with downward facing bats below. The chiming stone, also known as a lithophone, and called a qing in Chinese, is generally L-shaped, like a carpenter’s square and can be traced back to the Neolithic period. It is suspended by its apex and played using a mallet. During the Qing dynasty sets of twelve such chiming stones were made of jade for the palace where they were suspended on racks and were played on ceremonial occasions. Chiming stones are often included in porcelain decoration because qing chiming stone is a rebus for qing meaning to celebrate. The twin fish (shuang yu) are usually included in the Eight Buddhist Emblems, but are also auspicious on their own, symbolising marital bliss, many children and abundant good luck. The bats on the neck of the vessel also provide an auspicious wish, since in the Chinese arts bats (fuprovide a rebus for happiness (fu). It is no accident that the bats on the vase are shown upside-down. The Chinese word for upside-down (dao) has the same sound as the word for arrived (dao). Therefore, an upside-down bat indicates the arrival of happiness. The Eight Daoist Emblems combined with a suspended qing chiming stone can be seen on a Qianlong ruby-ground famille rose vase in the Palace Museum, Beijing (illustrated in Porcelains with Cloisonne Enamel Decoration and Famille Rose Decoration, The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum vol. 39, Hong Kong, 1999, p. 145, no. 127. A combination of twin fish, qing chiming stone and bats can be seen on the Qianlong doucai vase in the Palace Museum with scenes of tribute bearers, mentioned above. The exceptional quality, monumental size, and imposing presence of the current tianqiuping, as well as its fine and auspicious decoration, would have rendered it suitable for prominent display in one of the halls of the Qing palace.

 

This rare vase has a prestigious provenance, having been donated to the Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1960 by Mrs. Francis Keally. The vase was inherited by Mrs. Keally from her father George Hathaway Taber Jr. (1859-1940) who was a prolific collector of Chinese ceramics and jades with a discerning eye for quality and an unusually good understanding of what was appreciated by Chinese connoisseurs. The son of Capt. George H. Taber (1808-1901), who rose from a humble background to become a prominent member of the community filling a number of important offices including serving as President of Fairhaven Bank, George Taber Jr. made his mark as an oil executive, and ultimately board member, with the Gulf Oil Company. A selftaught engineer, he was instrumental in developing important advances in oil refining techniques. Believed to have been inspired by a relative who travelled to China and brought back not only fascinating tales but also beautiful objects, George Taber Jr. built up an extraordinary collection which was loaned or gifted to a number of museums. Upon his death in 1940, the collection was divided between his descendants and part of it was sold at the Parke Bernet Galleries, New York, 7-8 March 1946. The Philbrook Asian art collection is particularly strong in Japanese paintings from the Edo period (1603-1868), which came from the Shin’enkan collection of Oklahoma oil magnate, Joe D. Price. A further major gift, in this case of Southeast Asian ceramics, came from the Gillert Family, while the Taber Family donated Chinese ceramics and carvings. The current superb Qianlong vase, given by Taber’s daughter, Mrs. Francis Keally, has been an esteemed signature piece in the museum’s Asian art collection.

Christie's. Celestial Immortals - The Taber Family Tianqiuping from Philbrook Museum of Art, Hong Kong, 30 May 2018

 

A fine and very rare blue and white double-gourd vase, Qianlong six-character seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period

$
0
0

3

A fine and very rare blue and white double-gourd vase, Qianlong six-character seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795)

1

5

3

Lot 3004. A fine and very rare blue and white double-gourd vase, Qianlong six-character seal mark in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795); 9 1/8 in. (23.3 cm.) high. Estimate On Request. Price realised HKD 36,100,000. © Christie's Images Ltd 2018

The vase is well painted around the globular body with a lotus scroll between ruyi-heads encircling the shoulder and lotus lappets around the foot, the collared neck with further formal borders, all below the bulbous mouth decorated with further scrolling lotus within a trefoil border, flanked by a pair of strap-shaped handles with ruyi-head terminals, box.

Provenance: Sold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 12 May 1976, lot 111
The T.Y. Chao Private and Family Trust Collections of Important Chinese Ceramics and Jade Carvings: Part II, sold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 19 May 1987, lot 274
A Chinese private collection 
Sold at Christie’s Hong Kong, 1 December 2010, lot 3054.

LiteratureSotheby's Hong Kong - Twenty Years, Hong Kong, 1993, p. 157, no. 186.

ExhibitedMing and Ching Porcelain from the Collection of the T. Y. Chao Family Foundation, Hong Kong Museum of Art, 1978, illustrated in the Catalogue no. 88.

NoteThe present vase is the only known Qianlong example of this large size. The only other Qianlong-marked double-gourd vase of this pattern is a slightly smaller (18.8 cm.) example, sold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 3 May 1994, lot 174. This particularly elegant form also appears in famille roseduring the Qianlong reign, see, for example, the pair of ‘butterfly’ vases sold at Christie’s London, 9 May 2017, lot 99 (fig. 1).

4

A magnificent pair of famille rose 'butterfly' double-gourd vases, Qianlong six-character seal marks in underglaze blue and of the period (1736-1795), 9 in. (23 cm.) high. Sold for 14,725,000 GBP at Christie’s London, 9 May 2017, lot 99. © Christie's Images Ltd 2017.  

Cf. my post: A magnificent pair of famille rose 'butterfly' double-gourd vases, Qianlong six-character seal marks and of the period

The form first appeared during the Yongzheng reign, when they were made in considerably greater numbers and in several different decorative types, and can be divided into two size groups, one just exceeding 26 cm. in height, the other around approximately 23 cm. in height. For blue and white Yongzheng examples, see a vase (26.5 cm.) painted with fruiting and flowering branches on the lower body in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, illustrated in Harmony and Integrity: The Yongzheng Emperor and His Times, Taipei, 2009, p. 207, no. II-33; and another painted with a composite floral scroll on the lower body (22.9 cm.) from The British Rail Pension Fund, sold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 16 May 1989, lot 38. Compare, also, to two Yongzheng copper-red and underglaze-blue decorated examples decorated with lotus scrolls, one (27 cm.) in the Tianjin Municipal Museum, illustrated in Porcelains from the Tianjin Municipal Museum, Hong Kong, 1993, no. 146, the other (23.5 cm.) in Nanjing Museum, illustrated in The Official Kiln Porcelain of the Chinese Qing Porcelain, Shanghai, 2003, p. 128; and several celadon-glazed examples, which appears to have been the most popular type, including a moulded example in the Palace Museum, Beijing, illustrated in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum: Monochrome Porcelain, Hong Kong, 1999, pp. 142-143, no. 130 , and five other plain examples in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, as listed on the museum’s online archive; and a further robin’s egg-glazed example in the Chang Foundation, illustrated by J. Spencer, Selected Chinese Ceramics from Han to Qing Dynasties, Taipei, 1990, pp. 302-303, no. 132.

Christie's. Important Chinese Ceramics and Works of Art, Hong Kong, 30 May 2018

A superb and rare turquoise-ground famille rose lobed teapot and cover, Qianlong six-character seal mark and of the period

$
0
0

A superb and rare turquoise-ground famille rose lobed teapot and cover, Qianlong six-character seal mark in iron red and of the period (1736-1795)

2

3

4

1

Lot 3007. A superb and rare turquoise-ground famille rose lobed teapot and cover, Qianlong six-character seal mark in iron red and of the period (1736-1795); 6 ¾ in. (17.3 cm.) across. Estimate HKD 10,000,000 - HKD 15,000,000 (USD 1,280,576 - USD 1,920,864). Unsold. © Christie's Images Ltd 2018

The body of the teapot is finely moulded into six lobes, delicately decorated on each side with a large lotus blossom borne on scrolls, interlinked with a pale blue bat above, ruyi-head below, and smaller camellias on the sides, all against a soft pale turquoise ground. The spout and handle are similarly decorated with florettes borne on scrolls, the top of the handle picked out with the head of an archaistic dragon. The domed cover has a similarly lobed rim, decorated with four lotus blooms, surmounted by a bud finial painted with gilt overlapping petals against an iron-red ground. The interiors and base are applied with turquoise enamel. The rims are gilt; box. 

ProvenanceSold at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 5 November 1996, lot 882
Sold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 8 October 2013, lot 3034

Note: The exquisite enamelling and precise potting of this teapot are testament to the virtuosity and mastery of the potters at the Imperial kilns during the Qianlong period. Three Qianlong-marked teapots of the same coloured ground and similar motifs are preserved in the National Palace Museum, and were renamed as yangcai wares in the museum’s most recent publication, The Far-Reaching Fragrance of Tea: The Art and Culture of Tea in Asia, Taipei, 2016 (p. 147, no. I-60; p. 149, fig. 1; p. 158, fig. 1). One of these three teapots was previously from the Summer Palace, with remnants of tea leaves found inside the vessel, a reminder that these teapots were indeed functional utensils made for Imperial consumption. 

It is very rare to find a lobed porcelain teapot such as the current lot. This unusual form is possibly inspired by Kangxi falangcai prototypes, such as two Yixing falangcai enamelled teapots bearing Kangxi yuzhi marks of similar form, now in the National Palace Museum Collection, illustrated in Empty Vessels, Replenished Minds: The Culture, Practice and Art of Tea, Taipei, 2002, nos. 85 and 86.  

The intricate decorations on the current teapot convey multiple auspicious messages. ‘Lotus’ provides a homophone for the word for ‘continuity’, and is similar in pronunciation to the word for ‘year’. ‘Bat’ is a homophone to the word ‘blessing’. Hence the combined imagery of lotus and bat borne on scrolls on the current teapot qualifies the wish for ‘May you have endless blessings’. 

Christie's. Important Chinese Ceramics and Works of Art, Hong Kong, 30 May 2018

An important and extremely rare carved Longquan celadon jar, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368)

$
0
0

An important and extremely rare carved Longquan celadon jar, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368)

3

4

1

2

Lot 3028. An important and extremely rare carved Longquan celadon jar, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368); 11 3/4 in. (29.8 cm.) high. Estimate HKD 5,000,000 - HKD 7,000,000Price realised HKD 6,100,000. © Christie's Images Ltd 2018

The jar is heavily potted and well carved in relief around the sides with four panels enclosing seasonal flowers: camillia Japonica, peony, lotus and chrysanthemum, above a band of banana-leaf around the base. The shoulders are set with three zoomorphic monster masks modelled in high relief with bulging eyes and brows and reserved on a diapered ground in imitation of woven rattan. The neck carved with diamond-shaped diaper and all panels are conjoined by strapwork borders. The jar is covered overall with a thick glaze of bluish sea-green tone with the exception of the mouth rim, the inside of the base and the foot rim which remain unglazed, four brocade covers, Ming dynasty, Japanese double-wood.

ProvenanceThe Hisamatsu Family Collection, an important Daimyo family in Ehime prefecture that ruled during the Edo period (1603-1867)
Gifted to the present owner by the Hisamatsu family in 1955 (with a letter included with the jar recording the history).

5

Letter from the Hisamatsu Family to the present owner, dating to 1955.

THE PROPERTY OF A JAPANESE PRIVATE COLLECTION
Treasured Jar for the Most Precious Tea – A Rare14th century Longquan Jar
Rosemary ScottSenior International Academic Consultant Asian Art

It may well be the case that this jar arrived in Japan soon after its manufacture in the Chinese province of Zhejiang in the early Ming dynasty, since such pieces were greatly prized in Japan and many fine Longquan celadons were imported for appreciative Japanese patrons. Important vessels were preserved with care and handed down to succeeding generations, either within families or within temples. The current Longquan jar would have been particularly treasured not only for its rare form, but most especially for the exquisite colour of its glaze – an aspect of fine Longquan celadon wares, which has traditionally been revered by Japanese connoisseurs. 

The current jar was gifted to the current owner in 1955 by the important Hisamatsu family, who as daimyo or hanshu in the Edo period (AD 1603–1868) were feudal rulers of Iyo Matsuyama-han – present day Ehime prefecture in Shikoku Island . This significant role was held by 15 generations over a period of some 235 years. The family are related to one of the most famous figures of 16th-17th century Japan, Tokugawa Ieyasu (1543-1616), who became the first Shogun of the Tokugawa bakufu (1600-1868). Matsudaira Motoyasu , who changed his name to Tokugawa Ieyasu in 1566, was the son of Odai-no-kata (1528-1602) and Matsudaira Hirotada (1525-49). The second marriage of Tokugawa’s Ieyasu’s mother Odai-no-kata was to Hisamatau Toshikatsu (1526-1587) and the three sons of that marriage were thus half-brothers to Tokugawa Ieyasu. On a visit to the latter’s mother, he bestowed his family name, Matsudaira, on his half-brothers as a sign of their close familial bond, and the half brothers were comrades in arms into the 17th century. It was Tokugawa Ieyasu who sent the family to Sikoku Island, and the son of his third half-brother, Matsudaira Sadayuki (1587-1668), brought prosperity and stability to the region. The Hisamatsu family continued to use the Matsudaira name throughout the Edo period. However, after the end of the Tokugawa shogunate in 1868, the family were required by the new Meiji 明治regime to revert to the name Hisamatsu. 

The Matsudaira (Hisamatsu) family were keen practitioners of the tea ceremony, and even today, the region of Iyo Matsuyama, over which the family ruled, is still known for the numbers who take part in the tea ceremony. Despite a paucity of surviving records, some 280 tea ceremonies are recorded in the remaining archives for the 66 years from 1812 to 1878. While he was hanshu of Iyo Matsuyama, Matsudaira Sadanao (1660-1720) employed a tea master Joso Soan (1673-1704), who was the 5th head tea master of the Ura-Senke school , which is one of the three most important tea ceremony schools in Japan, which trace their roots to the revered Sen-no-Rikyu (1522-91) – the founder of the wabi style of tea ceremony. Joso Soan designed gardens, tea ceremony utensils and even palaces for Iyo Matsuyama, and his descendants continued to work for the Matsudaira family for more than 170 years. The family continued to hold tea ceremonies and an Ehime prefectural bulletin noted that in 1922, Hisamatsu Sadakoto (1867-1943), who became a high-ranking officer in the Imperial Japanese army, organised a tea ceremony to which he invited the French General Joseph Joffre (1852-1931). The family’s continued appreciation of exceptional works of art used in the tea ceremony can be seen in the fact that in 1922 Hisamatsu Sadakoto is recorded as displaying a triptych by a famous Rinpa painter of the Edo period, while a Chinese Yuan dynasty lacquer box inscribed by the famous lacquer artist Zhang Cheng was used to contain incense and a maki-e lacquer container was used for the tea, which had been arranged by the 11th Ura Senke head tea master Gengen-sai (1810-77).

5

Matsuyama Family Castle, Ehime, Shigoku© National Diet Library database

The current jar can be seen against this background of tea connoisseurship and the appreciation of special objects for use in the tea ceremony by the Hisamatsu family. This Longquan celadon jar was reserved for the first fine tea of the year. The tea leaves were picked in spring and were matured in the jar during the summer. The mouth of the jar would have been tightly sealed using a wooden plug covered with several layers of paper, which would have been tied in place. The short neck and flanged mouth of the current jar would have made it particularly suitable for this. One of the surviving records, see below, suggests that such jars may have been suspended under the floor in a net bag – possibly to keep them cool during the heat of summer. The first tea ceremony of the year, known as Kuchikiri-no-chaji (literally ‘mouth cutting tea ceremony’) is held in early November. Before the ceremony the bamboo hedges and water troughs in the garden of the tea room are replaced. In the tea room itself, the paper of the shojisliding doors is replaced and new tatami mats are put on the floor. In preparation for the ceremony, the tea leaf jar is given a fine silk cover called a kuchioi held in place with a decorative rope called a kazario. During the ceremony the silk fabric cover is carefully removed, the paper is cut and the wooden plug taken out to provide access to the tea inside the jar. The new tea leaves are ground into powder with a pestle in a stone mortar before being used to prepare the tea.

It is very rare that a Longquan celadon jar is used for this purpose, however, there are some historical references to such jars. A letter from the famous tea master Sen-no-Rikyu to Shunoku Soen (1529-1611), abbot of the Daitokuji Temple in Kyoto, described the tea utensils used in a tea ceremony held by Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1537-98) at the emperor’s palace on 7th October 1585. Sen-no-Rikyu noted: ‘...a kinuta tea leaf jar in a net under the floor’. Kinuta in this instance refers to Longquan celadon, as this was the term used for the fine Longquan glaze which was associated in Japan with kinuta (mallet-shaped) vases. Certain inventories such as Matsuya-Meibutsushu , which was compiled by the merchant Matsuya Hisashige (1567 – 1652), and Kokon-Meibutsu-ruiju, compiled by Matsudaira Fumai (1751-1818), the daimyo of Izumo Matsuyama-han, listed Longquan kinuta celadon jars as tea leaf jars. A rare example of such a jar is today preserved in the Seikado Bunko Art Museum, Tokyo. (fig. 1)

A carved Longquan celadon jar, collection of Seikado Bunko Art Museum

fig. 1. A carved Longquan celadon jar, collection of Seikado Bunko Art Museum.

Such was the value placed on the current jar, and those similarly used for the leaf tea of the kuchikiri-no-chaji ceremony, that valuable Ming dynasty brocades were used to provide the decorative top covers of the jar. As noted above, several layers of paper were used beneath the silk cover, which would have protected the precious brocade. The top covers themselves are significant and valuable items, which add greatly to the important history of the jar. Each cover preserved with the current jar is made of a different silk fabric, two of them including so-called ‘flat-gold’ weft threads. 

 

The beautiful cloud-patterned damask cover (fig. 2) represents a design which was especially popular in the Ming dynasty, and became famous as Nanjing yunjin. It was sometimes used for the clothing of members of the Chinese aristocracy, and a robe made from a yellow silk satin damask with this design was excavated from the tomb of Wang Zhiyuan – a relative of Lady Wang, who was Xiaozhen Empress to the Chenghua Emperor (r. 1465-87) – which was found outside the Zhonghua Gate, Nanjing (illustrated in Power and Glory: Court Arts of Chinas Ming Dynasty, San Francisco, 2008, p. 70, no. 30). Another fragment of Ming silk damask with this type of design is illustrated by Zhao Feng in Treasures in Silk, Hong Kong, 1999, p. 267, fig. 09.00e. A further fragment of similarly decorated Ming dynasty silk damask was excavated from a Ming dynasty tomb in Jian’gexian, Sichuan province, illustrated by Wu Min in Zhi xiu, Taipei, 1992, p. 216, pl. 153. Two versions of this design were also used for the covers of two volumes of a six-volume Buddhist sutra printed in 1584, when the silks would already have been precious antiques (see S. Vainker, Chinese Silk: A Cultural History, London, 2004, p. 147, pl. 93, second and fourth from the left). 

6

fig. 2 Silk cover of the current lot.

In the late Yuan and Ming dynasty the yunjing cloud design was also sometimes combined with smaller depictions of the babao Eight Treasures. A late Yuan dynasty example of this design can be seen on a piece of damask cloth illustrated by Gao Hanyu, et al., in Chinese Textile Designs, (Rosemary Scott and Susan Whitfield translators), London, 1986, p. 88, no. 61, while two duan satin damask Ming dynasty examples are illustrated in the same volume on page 107, nos. 85-6. It is interesting to note that this combination of motifs appears to have been the inspiration for the unusually small-scale design on the gold and ivory cover (fig. 3) belonging to the current jar. However, the Eight Treasures were also used in combination with single ruyi heads as on one of the brocades used on a sutra cover from the group discussed above (see S. Vainker, Chinese Silk: A Cultural History, op. cit., far right). They could also be combined with dragon roundels as on at late 14th or early 15th century sutra cover of blue ling twill with gold design illustrated in the same volume on page 155, pl. 99.

7

fig. 3. Silk cover of the current lot.

The polychrome damask cloth with cloud-edged roundels set against a complex lattice of blue and green (fig. 4) is both rare and interesting for its association with other media. The ground pattern composed of hexagons entwined with circles is rare amongst textiles, but the same structure can be seen on an imperial blue and white porcelain tile excavated in 1993 from the Xuande strata at the imperial Jingdezhen kilns in Jiangxi province, illustrated in Xuande Imperial Porcelain excavated at Jingdezhen, Taipei, 1998, p. 122, no. F21. The effect of this combination of shapes was to produce an internal form which is reminiscent of that seen in armour, such as that depicted as being worn by Guan Yu in the painting Guan Yu Capturing Peng De (Guan Yu qinjiang tu) by Shang Xi (active c. 1426-35), illustrated by C. Clunas and J. Harrison-Hall in Ming  50 Years that changed China, London, 2014, p. 27, fig. 5. The internal form had occasionally been used alone as a textile design in the Liao dynasty, as seen on a 10th century jin fabric fragment illustrated by Zhao Feng in Treasures in Silk, Hong Kong, 1999, p. 182, fig. 06.00d. 

9

fig. 4. Silk cover of the current lot.

The magnificent blue and gold silk brocade used to make the fourth cover (fig. 5) for the current jar has a floral scroll design that has a long history amongst fine Chinese woven silks that goes back at least to the Song dynasty – see for example the Northern Song ivory ling twill damask illustrated by J.C.Y. Watt and A.E. Wardwell in When Silk Was Gold Central Asian and Chinese Textiles, New York, 1997, p. 49, no. 11. The brocade example used for the jar cover, however, has a boldness that is especially associated with the Yuan and early Ming dynasty. A Ming dynasty deep blue brocade with a similar golden design to that seen on the jar cover is in the collection of the Xinjiang Museum and is illustrated in by Wu Min in Zhi xiu, op. cit., p. 216, lower image. Interestingly, there is a hanging scroll in the collection of the British Museum (see Ming  50 Years that changed China, op. cit., p. 269, fig. 229), dated to the period AD 1450-1500 and painted either in Ningbo China or in Japan after a Chinese original, which is entitled Tenjin in China and depicts Tōtō Tenjin (Sugawara no Michizane AD 845-903), who was an eminent scholar, poet and politician in the Heian period (AD 794-1185) in Japan, but who fell into conflict with the powerful Fujiwara clan and was demoted. However, after his death, Tenjin came to be revered as the God of Learning. In the British Museum hanging scroll Tenjin is shown wearing a robe edged with a rich brocade very similar to that which forms the blue and gold cover of the current jar. 

10

fig. 5. Silk cover of the current lot.

Like the shifuku pouches made in Japan to encase prized tea containers and venerated tea bowls, covers for important kuchikiri-no-chaji tea leaf jars, such as the current example, were sometimes made from fine Chinese brocades. The famous tea masters chose to use meibutsugire ‘celebrated textiles’ for these tea ceremony accoutrements, and often the items came to be known by the name of the place or famous person with whom they were associated. These meibutsugire were also used for the fukusa small cloth wrappers used in the tea ceremony, and for mounting hanging scrolls. Among the most valued textiles were those imported from China in period from the 14th to the 18th century. These textiles entered Japan either as kāṣāya (Buddhist clerical robes, ; jiasha in Chinese) brought back by monks returning to Japan from China, or as part of Sino-Japanese trade. As time went on even the smallest fragment of these historical Chinese textiles was treasured and might be used, for example, to embellish the robe of an important person from the military class. The most prized of all the Chinese textiles were those, like the blue and gold silk used as a cover for the current jar, known as – kinran ‘gold robe’ in Japanese, but more often referred to in Chinese as jinjin ‘gold brocade’. This was often a lampas weave in silk and metallic thread, which had a gold (or silver) design, usually produced by incorporating gold applied to fine strips of paper. The famous Japanese tea master Kobori Enshu (AD 1579-1647) became especially fascinated with imported Chinese textiles and used them in the tea ceremony. In 2014 the Kyoto National Museum held an exhibition entitled: Luxurious Imported Textiles: Buddhist Robes and Meibutsugire, which examined this important subject. 

The current jar, with its extraordinary glaze, is not only a remarkable example of the finest celadons made in the early Ming dynasty, but is of great significance for its history within an important Japanese family. It is also of cultural significance for the part it has played in major tea ceremony events. The silks from which its decorative covers are made are, in addition, rare and important items in their own right, as well as demonstrating yet another facet of the role played by the decorative arts of China in the Japanese tea ceremony. 

Christie's. Important Chinese Ceramics and Works of Art, Hong Kong, 30 May 2018

A rare Ming-style blue and white floral-form bowl, Kangxi six-character mark and of the period

$
0
0

A rare Ming-style blue and white floral-form bowl, Kangxi six-character mark in underglaze blue within a double circle and of the period (1662-1722)

1

2

Lot 3002. A rare Ming-style blue and white floral-form bowl, Kangxi six-character mark in underglaze blue within a double circle and of the period (1662-1722); 7 5/8 in. (19.4 cm.) diam. Estimate HKD 2,000,000 - HKD 3,000,000Price realised HKD 2,500,000© Christie's Images Ltd 2018

The bowl is finely potted with ten lobes, each lobe is painted on the exterior with a medallion of descending or ascending five-clawed dragon amidst clouds, the centre of the interior is similarly painted with a single dragon roundel, stand, Japanese wood box.

ProvenanceSold at Sotheby’s Hong Kong, 28 April 1993, lot 137.

NoteThree other Kangxi-marked bowls of this rare design are published. The first is in the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney, illustrated by Julian Thompson ‘Chinese Porcelain in the Collection of the Art Gallery of New South Wales’, Orientations, September 2000, p. 100, figs. 7 and 7a (mark); one from the Frederick T. Fuller Collection, sold at Christie’s London, 28-29 June 1965; and the third was sold at Christie’s London, 6 November 2007, lot 172.

Bowl, circa 1720, Kangxi reign, porcelain with underglaze blue decoration, 9

Bowl, circa 1720, Kangxi reign, porcelain with underglaze blue decoration, 9.7 x 19.7 cm. Purchased 1965, EC7.1965 © Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney.

The form and design of these bowls follow closely a Xuande-marked example illustrated in Sekai Toji Zenshu: Ming, vol. 14, 1976, p. 166, no. 152, which has an additional band of upright lotus lappets above the foot. Compare, also, two other Xuande-period bowls of this form in the Shanghai Museum, one is unmarked and of comparable size (fig. 1), the second with a Xuande mark but slightly smaller, illustrated in Studies of the Shanghai Museum Collections, Ming Dynasty Ceramics, Shanghai, 2007, p. 116, figs. 3-32 and 3-33, respectively. Similar design of dragon roundels also appears on washers from the Xuande period, such as the example in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, illustrated in Catalogue of the Special Exhibition of Selected Hsüan-te Imperial Porcelains of the Ming Dynasty, Taipei, 1998, pp. 420-421, no. 183.

Bowl, Xuande period (1425-1435) in the Collection of the Shanghai Museum

3

Fig.1. Bowl, Xuande period  (1425-1435) in the Collection of the Shanghai Museum.

Christie's. Important Chinese Ceramics and Works of Art, Hong Kong, 30 May 2018

Viewing all 36084 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>